The Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation confirmed by majority that Cristina Kirchner must continue wearing an electronic ankle monitor and under visit controls during her house arrest.
Judges Gustavo Hornos and Diego G. Barroetaveña rejected the defense appeal. They deemed the measures reasonable to ensure compliance with the sentence.
Judge Mariano Borinsky dissented. He proposed accepting the appeal, removing the ankle monitor and visit restrictions, and keeping only the obligation not to disturb the neighborhood.
The majority decision upholds the regime set by Federal Oral Court No. 2. This includes prior authorization for visits and electronic monitoring.
