Sean Dunn celebrates his acquittal outside a Washington D.C. courthouse after being found not guilty of assaulting a federal agent with a sandwich.
Sean Dunn celebrates his acquittal outside a Washington D.C. courthouse after being found not guilty of assaulting a federal agent with a sandwich.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

D.C. jury acquits ‘sandwich guy’ Sean Dunn of assaulting federal agent

AI에 의해 생성된 이미지
사실 확인됨

A Washington jury on Thursday, November 6, 2025, found Sean C. Dunn not guilty of misdemeanor assault for throwing a sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent during President Donald Trump’s law-enforcement surge in the nation’s capital.

A federal jury in Washington, D.C., acquitted Sean C. Dunn on a misdemeanor assault charge stemming from an August 10, 2025, incident in which he threw a sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent amid protests over the Trump administration’s policing surge. Dunn, who gained internet notoriety as the city’s “sandwich guy,” was cleared after a three-day trial. Jurors deliberated for about seven hours over two days before returning the verdict. (reuters.com)

Prosecutors said Dunn hurled the sub “at point-blank range.” Agent Gregory Lairmore testified he felt the impact through his ballistic vest and that condiments and an onion strand ended up on his uniform and police radio antenna. Video from that night shows Dunn shouting at agents before throwing the sandwich; Lairmore’s colleagues later gave him gag gifts referencing a “felony footlong.” The confrontation unfolded outside a Subway restaurant at 14th and U Streets NW. (washingtonpost.com)

The U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, led by Jeanine Pirro, initially sought a felony indictment, but a grand jury declined to charge Dunn at that level. Prosecutors then filed a misdemeanor case. During the trial before U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols, the government argued that Dunn crossed the line from protected speech to assault; defense lawyers countered that the toss was not “forcible” under the law and could not injure armored officers. The jury agreed with the defense and acquitted Dunn. (reuters.com)

Body-camera footage captured Dunn acknowledging, “I did it. I threw a sandwich. I did it to draw them away from where they were.” After the verdict, he told reporters he believed he was protecting immigrants’ rights that night. (washingtonpost.com)

The case became a prominent test of prosecutions tied to Trump’s late-summer federalization of D.C. policing and deployment of National Guard troops and federal agents. In several related matters, grand juries have declined to indict, and another trial last month ended in an acquittal, underscoring the difficulties prosecutors have faced in surge-linked cases. (reuters.com)

Pirro said her office accepts the verdict but maintained that “law enforcement should never be subjected to assault, no matter how ‘minor’... Even children know when they are angry, they are not allowed to throw objects at one another.” (reuters.com)

관련 기사

Courtroom illustration depicting a federal judge declaring mistrial over defense attorney's political clothing during jury selection in Prairieland ICE shooting case.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Judge declares mistrial during jury selection in Prairieland ICE facility shooting case

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

A federal judge in Fort Worth declared a mistrial Tuesday during jury selection in the case against nine defendants charged in connection with a July 4, 2025, attack outside the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, after raising concerns that a defense attorney’s clothing could be seen as political messaging to prospective jurors.

A federal jury in Texas convicted eight defendants on Friday of providing material support to terrorists for their roles in a July 4, 2025, attack on the Prairieland ICE detention center in Alvarado. The incident involved fireworks, vandalism, and gunfire that injured a police officer. Prosecutors described the event as a premeditated terror attack inspired by antifa ideology.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Federal immigration authorities fatally shot an armed individual during a targeted operation in Minneapolis on Saturday morning. Local Democratic leaders condemned the incident and blamed the Trump administration, while President Trump accused them of inciting unrest. The Department of Homeland Security described the shooting as defensive after the suspect resisted officers.

Federal prosecutors say Luis David Nino-Moncada, a Venezuelan national whom authorities describe as an associate of the Tren de Aragua gang, repeatedly rammed an unoccupied Border Patrol vehicle during a targeted stop in Portland, Oregon, prompting an agent to fire and wound him and a passenger. Nino-Moncada has been charged with aggravated assault of a federal officer and damaging federal property, according to the U.S. Justice Department.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The father of 20-year-old National Guard member Sarah Beckstrom, shot in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, said she suffered a mortal wound and is unlikely to recover. Beckstrom and fellow guardsman Andrew Wolfe, both 24 or younger, remain in critical condition after surgery. The suspect, Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal, faces assault charges that could escalate to murder if either victim dies.

A federal appeals court has ruled that the Justice Department showed probable cause to charge former CNN host Don Lemon and four others for their involvement in an anti-ICE protest that stormed a Minneapolis church. However, the court refused to compel a lower judge to issue arrest warrants. The decision highlights tensions between press freedom claims and federal charges under religious interference laws.

AI에 의해 보고됨

President Donald Trump has threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act to suppress protests in Minneapolis against federal immigration enforcement, following the fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen by an ICE agent. The incident, captured on video, has sparked widespread demonstrations and criticism of the Trump administration's tactics. Minnesota officials have vowed to challenge any such invocation in court.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부