Democrats introduce bill to ban ICE and CBP facial recognition use

A group of Senate Democrats has introduced the 'ICE Out of Our Faces Act,' aiming to prohibit Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from using facial recognition and other biometric surveillance technologies. The legislation would require deletion of past data and allow individuals to sue for violations. Introduced on February 5, 2026, the bill faces slim chances in a Republican-majority Congress.

On February 5, 2026, Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) introduced the 'ICE Out of Our Faces Act' in the Senate, cosponsored by Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). The bill was announced at a press conference alongside Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.).

The proposed law would make it unlawful for ICE and CBP officers to acquire, possess, access, or use any biometric surveillance systems, including facial recognition and voice recognition, or information derived from such systems operated by other entities. All previously collected data from these systems must be deleted. The ban extends to prohibiting the use of such data in court cases or investigations. Individuals affected by violations could sue the federal government for financial damages, and state attorneys general could bring suits on behalf of residents.

At the press conference, Markey described the situation as 'a dangerous moment for America,' stating that ICE and CBP 'have built an arsenal of surveillance technologies that are designed to track and to monitor and to target individual people, both citizens and non-citizens alike. Facial recognition technology sits at the center of a digital dragnet that has been created in our nation.' Jayapal added, 'This is a very dangerous intersection of overly violent and overzealous activity from ICE and Border Patrol, and the increasing use of biometric identification systems. This has become a surveillance state with militarized federal troops on our streets terrorizing and intimidating US citizens and residents alike.'

The bill comes amid reports of ICE and CBP deploying tools like the Mobile Fortify face-recognition app, used over 100,000 times to identify immigrants and citizens, though it was not designed for reliable street-level identification and was rolled out after the Department of Homeland Security abandoned its privacy rules. Incidents include an ICE observer in Minnesota whose Global Entry and TSA PreCheck privileges were revoked after a face scan, and a Portland, Maine, case where an agent labeled a video-recording observer a 'domestic terrorist' and mentioned a database. A CNN report highlighted a Minneapolis ICE memo instructing agents to capture images, license plates, and details on protesters.

While Democratic leaders Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer demanded ICE reforms like body-worn cameras for accountability and bans on tracking First Amendment activities, their list did not include a facial recognition prohibition. Markey separately sought confirmation on a 'domestic terrorists' database listing US citizens protesting immigration policies. With a Republican-majority Congress, passage of the bill appears unlikely.

관련 기사

Dramatic illustration depicting congressional deadlock over DHS funding, protests against ICE, and Minneapolis shooting aftermath amid government shutdown threat.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Congress heads toward partial shutdown over DHS funding fight

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

A dispute in Congress over Department of Homeland Security funding, intensified by two fatal shootings by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, has raised the likelihood of a partial government shutdown by the end of the week. Senate Democrats are refusing to support the funding without reforms to Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. Republicans accuse Democrats of attempting to defund ICE amid ongoing protests in the city.

The U.S. House of Representatives approved a package of spending bills on Thursday to avert a partial government shutdown, though many Democrats opposed the funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement amid concerns over its tactics. The measure now heads to the Senate for a vote ahead of a January 30 deadline. Objections stemmed from a recent fatal shooting by an ICE officer in Minneapolis and broader criticisms of the agency's enforcement practices.

AI에 의해 보고됨 사실 확인됨

The deaths of Renée Macklin Good and Alex Pretti during federal immigration enforcement actions in Minnesota have sharpened a partisan divide over how states should respond to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Democratic-led states are exploring new oversight and legal tools aimed at federal agents, while Republican-led states are moving to deepen cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Employees at Google DeepMind have urged company leaders to implement policies ensuring their physical safety from Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents while at work. This follows an alleged attempt by a federal agent to enter the company's Cambridge campus last fall. The request stems from internal concerns shared via messages obtained by WIRED.

AI에 의해 보고됨

In response to federal immigration enforcement operations, activists in Minneapolis have set up makeshift roadblocks to monitor and restrict access to their communities. The actions follow the fatal shooting of anti-ICE protester Alex Pretti and have prompted a partial drawdown of federal agents. Local leaders and protesters cite public safety concerns, while federal officials emphasize cooperation with jails to target criminal immigrants.

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro accused federal immigration enforcement of lacking a legitimate purpose, claiming it only serves to infringe on constitutional rights. Speaking on ABC's 'The View,' the potential 2028 Democratic contender vowed to challenge such operations in his state through legal means. His remarks came amid a deadly incident involving Border Patrol in Minneapolis.

AI에 의해 보고됨

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부