Realistic illustration of a press conference announcing charges against senators in a flood control kickback scandal, with documents and public frustration depicted.
Realistic illustration of a press conference announcing charges against senators in a flood control kickback scandal, with documents and public frustration depicted.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

ICI recommends charges against senators in flood control scandal

AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

The Independent Commission for Infrastructure has recommended criminal and administrative complaints against Senators Joel Villanueva and Jinggoy Estrada, former Representative Zaldy Co, and three others over alleged kickbacks in flood control projects. Related probes include a forged affidavit by a Senate witness linked to Co and efforts to forfeit implicated assets. Lawmakers are pushing for a stronger anti-corruption body amid public frustration with the inquiry's pace.

The Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) has recommended the filing of criminal and administrative complaints against Senators Joel Villanueva and Jinggoy Estrada, resigned Ako Bicol party-list Representative Zaldy Co, and three other individuals implicated in a kickback scheme involving anomalous flood control projects. This development stems from investigations into widespread corruption within the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), highlighted by recent Senate hearings.

A key witness in the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, Orly Guteza—a former security consultant for Co—claimed he delivered suitcases of cash to Co's residence and that of House Speaker Martin Romualdez. However, the sworn affidavit supporting this testimony was found falsified. On October 24, Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 18 recommended charges against Guteza for presenting the falsely notarized document, allegedly involving a forged signature and seal of lawyer Petchie Rose Espera, who denied any involvement. Guteza failed to appear in court proceedings. The Department of Justice (DOJ), led by Prosecutor General Anthony Fadullon, stated on October 29 that it has yet to receive the court's order but will act accordingly once obtained.

Complicating matters, the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) confirmed that three aircraft linked to Co are no longer in the country. DPWH Secretary Vince Dizon noted on October 29 that these assets are already under a freeze order and cannot be sold, paving the way for future forfeiture. Dizon is scheduled to meet ICI officials on October 30 at 10 a.m. to discuss filing civil forfeiture cases—this marks their second such meeting. Co resigned as a lawmaker following his identification as a central figure in the scandal.

In response to perceived limitations in the current probe, Navotas Representative Toby Tiangco filed House Bill 5699 to establish the Independent Commission Against Infrastructure Corruption (ICAIC), granting it powers to issue subpoenas, seek preventive suspensions, hold departure orders, and recover properties. Tiangco highlighted the ICI's inability to enforce contempt against non-compliant witnesses. Similarly, Senator Francis Pangilinan has proposed a Senate bill for an Independent People’s Commission with subpoena and contempt authority. Dizon also formed an Internal Investigation Committee within DPWH on October 29, chaired by Undersecretary Ricardo Bernabe III, to probe corruption and recommend actions, in line with President Marcos' directive for agency reform.

관련 기사

독립 인프라 위원회(ICI)가 비공개 최종 보고서를 제출한 뒤 활동을 종료했다. 말라카냥 궁은 마르코스 대통령이 홍수 방지 사업의 부패 척결 의지를 잊지 않았다고 밝혔다. 법무부는 비리 사업과 관련해 6억 1,100만 페소 이상의 자금을 회수했다고 보고했다.

AI에 의해 보고됨

말라카냥은 독립 인프라 위원회(ICI)의 홍수 조절 조사 결과 공개를 옴부즈맨에게 일임하기로 했다. ICI는 어제 관련 문서를 법무부(DOJ)에 인계했으며, 법무부는 해당 문서를 검토하여 향후 사건 기소의 단서로 활용할 예정이다.

판필로 “핑” 락손 상원의원은 이번 주 초 예고한 대로 2026년 5월 5일, 상원 블루리본 위원회의 홍수 통제 조사에 대한 중간 보고서를 공식 제출에 필요한 찬성 표를 확보하지 못한 상태임에도 불구하고 특권 연설을 통해 발표했다. 그는 홍수 통제 스캔들에 대한 투명성을 요구하는 대중의 긴급한 목소리를 이유로 들었으며, 해당 보고서에는 7명의 상원의원만이 서명했다.

AI에 의해 보고됨

필리핀 부패방지법원인 Sandiganbayan은 오리엔탈 민도로 홍수 조절 사업 예산 횡령 사건과 관련하여 도주 중인 잘디 코 의원의 공동 피고인 9명이 신청한 보석 기각 결정에 대해 재심 신청을 거부하며 27쪽 분량의 결정문을 통해 기존 입장을 고수했다.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부