Chhattisgarh High Court: no permission needed for home prayer meetings

The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that individuals do not need permission from authorities to hold religious prayer meetings at home if no law is violated. It quashed police notices against petitioners from Janjgir-Champa district and directed officials not to interfere with their civil rights.

Petitioners, residents of Godhna village in Chhattisgarh’s Janjgir-Champa district, have been organising prayer meetings for Christianity believers on the first floor of their house since 2016. They alleged interference by Nawagarh police, who served notices three times to restrain them, and the gram panchayat, which withdrew an earlier no-objection certificate.

The petitioners claimed this violated Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. The state counsel sought time to reply, noting criminal cases against the petitioners, their time in jail, and that they never sought permission for the meetings.

Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi refused additional time for the state and quashed the police notices. The court stated, “The petitioners are registered owner of the land where they used to organise ‘prayer meeting’ of the followers of Christianity at their dwelling house … Further, there is no need to get prior permission from any authority for conducting prayer/prayer meetings, if the same is organised without violating any law … Consequently, the respondents/police authorities are directed not to interfere with the civil rights of the petitioners and also shall not harass them under the guise of enquiry or so.”

Relaterte artikler

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
Bilde generert av AI

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

The Surat Municipal Commissioner informed the Gujarat High Court that no orders were issued for the May 30 demolition of structures in Ved Darwaja. The court questioned the roles of police and civic officials during the action that affected dozens of homes.

Rapportert av AI

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

Undertrials in several high-profile cases are approaching courts for permission to use computers or laptops to examine voluminous electronic evidence and chargesheets in Indian jails.

Rapportert av AI

The Centre told the Delhi high court that it will not take immediate possession of the Delhi Gymkhana Club following its May 22 notice. Any further action will follow due process and prior notice. The court issued summons but declined interim directions.

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis