Madhya Pradesh high court reserves order in Bhojshala dispute

The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday reserved its order in the Bhojshala case after hearing arguments over the religious character of the disputed site in Dhar.

A division bench of Justices Vijay Kumar Shukla and Alok Awasthi heard the matter for 36 days after daily proceedings began on April 6. The case centres on the Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque complex, a monument protected by the Archaeological Survey of India.

The state government told the court that the structure was never a mosque and that permission for namaz had been granted only to ease communal tensions before 1935. It added that the premises belong to the state and fall under ASI control.

The ASI maintained that the existing structure was built from parts of earlier temples dating to the Parmar era. Hindu petitioners sought exclusive worship rights and an end to namaz, while the Muslim side challenged the survey findings and argued that the site has long been recognised as a mosque.

Relaterte artikler

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
Bilde generert av AI

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court announced on April 2 that it will commence regular hearings on the Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque dispute cases in Dhar from April 6. The decision follows the Supreme Court's refusal on April 1 to intervene in a Muslim side petition, directing the High Court to address all parties' objections.

Rapportert av AI

Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Mohan Yadav announced financial assistance of ₹5 lakh each to families of three men who died in 2003 Bhojshala protests.

The Supreme Court has directed the immediate removal of encroachers and illegal structures from the Agasthyamalai landscape in South India.

Rapportert av AI

The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that individuals do not need permission from authorities to hold religious prayer meetings at home if no law is violated. It quashed police notices against petitioners from Janjgir-Champa district and directed officials not to interfere with their civil rights.

The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the Chhattisgarh High Court’s order convicting Amit Jogi to life imprisonment in the 2003 murder of Ram Avtar Jaggi, a political rival of his father Ajit Jogi. Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta issued notice on Jogi’s appeal and suspended the high court’s April 2, 2026, judgment. The bench ordered that the conviction under IPC Sections 302 and 120B and the life sentence remain stayed pending hearing.

Rapportert av AI

The Karnataka high court has upheld the state government's cancellation of recognition for a private school that had operated for 20 years on a fake certificate. Authorities found the managing society ran multiple schools under one certificate, diverted fees to unregistered accounts, and illegally operated a madrasa on campus. The education department revoked recognition on May 30, 2025, with the appellate authority endorsing it in January 2026.

 

 

 

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis