Rahm Emanuel backs mandatory retirement at 75 for federal officials, including presidents and judges

Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor and U.S. ambassador to Japan, said he supports a mandatory retirement age of 75 for federal public officials — a limit he said would apply to presidents, Cabinet members, members of Congress and federal judges, and would also constrain his own prospects if he runs for the White House.

Rahm Emanuel, 66, called on Wednesday for a mandatory retirement age of 75 for the president and other senior federal officials, arguing the cap should apply across all branches of government.

“You’re 75 years old: done,” Emanuel said at an event hosted by the Center for American Progress in Washington, according to POLITICO.

Emanuel said the cutoff should extend to the legislative branch, the executive branch — including the Cabinet — and the judiciary, including the Supreme Court and lower federal courts. He framed the idea as a way to force turnover in an era when the age of national leaders has become a recurring political issue.

Under the standard Emanuel described, President Donald Trump, 79, would be ineligible to serve, and former President Joe Biden would not have been able to complete his term, POLITICO reported. Emanuel also said the rule would affect 17 senators and 45 House members who are 75 or older.

Emanuel, seen as a potential 2028 presidential contender, acknowledged the proposal would limit him as well. He would be 69 when sworn in if he were elected in 2028, and 73 at the start of a second term, leaving him unable to serve a full second four-year term under the 75-year cutoff.

“I know where I am in my age. Of course it would apply to me,” Emanuel said, according to POLITICO. “You can’t say ‘here’s what I want to do to change Washington’ — but I get an exemption.”

Emanuel likened the proposed age limit to mandatory retirement rules in other sectors and joked that officials reaching the cap should find something else to do. “Go work on your golf swing, it’s not that good to begin with,” he said.

The proposal comes as public concerns about the age of national leaders have intensified in recent election cycles. Surveys in recent years have consistently found broad support for maximum age limits for federal elected officials and Supreme Court justices.

Emanuel said he would seek to enact the policy through legislation rather than through a constitutional amendment, though legal questions could arise because the Constitution sets minimum ages for federal elected offices but does not impose maximum ages, and gives federal judges lifetime tenure. POLITICO noted the idea could also face political resistance in a Senate with a median age around the mid-60s.

Emanuel also placed the age-limit proposal within a broader set of anti-corruption and ethics changes, including tighter restrictions on lobbying, gifts, and stock trading by public officials. He argued Democrats should make those issues central to their message, saying the current administration has “expanded” the “swamp” — language he used to turn President Trump’s signature campaign phrase back against him.

Emanuel’s choice of 75 echoes a widely discussed 2014 essay by his brother, Ezekiel Emanuel, an oncologist and former Obama administration adviser, who argued that living past 75 often brings more decline than benefit, POLITICO reported.

Hva folk sier

X discussions on Rahm Emanuel's proposal for a mandatory retirement age of 75 for federal officials including presidents and judges feature support from users praising it as a smart reform for fresh leadership across government branches. Skeptics highlight its self-serving nature, as it would bar Emanuel from a second presidential term. Critics label it political theater distracting from issues like term limits and wasteful spending. Journalists provide context emphasizing Emanuel's willingness to apply it to himself.

Relaterte artikler

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu announces the suspension of the 2023 pension reform at a press conference, with French flags and documents in the background.
Bilde generert av AI

French prime minister suspends pension reform until 2027

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has announced the suspension of the 2023 pension reform, deferring discussions on age and contribution duration until after the 2027 presidential election. The move aims to stabilize the budget amid democratic distrust, but it sparks debate on implications for equality and professional inequalities. Experts note that the reform's foundations remain unchanged, while urging fixes for disparities, especially for women and seniors.

A survey reveals that half of Germans reject linking the retirement age to contribution years. Economist Jens Südekum's proposal faces skepticism especially among academics and supporters of left-leaning parties. Politicians from SPD and CSU remain open to the idea.

Rapportert av AI

The Supreme Court (MA) has formed a selection committee to find a replacement for Constitutional Court Justice Anwar Usman, who will retire at the end of 2026. MA Chief Justice Sunarto emphasized the need for a balance of knowledge and faith in prospective judges. The selection process involves various community figures and academics.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva turned 80 on October 27, becoming the first octogenarian to hold the office in Brazil. He celebrated the occasion during an official visit to Malaysia, where he is attending the Asean summit. Lula stated he has the energy to run for re-election in 2026.

Rapportert av AI

The National Assembly adopted a government amendment on November 12 suspending the 2023 pension reform until 2027, with 255 votes in favor and 146 against. This measure, demanded by socialists to avoid censure, divided the left, as Insoumis voted against in favor of full repeal. Debates on the Social Security budget ended at midnight on November 13 without a vote, sending the text to the Senate.

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

Rapportert av AI

In 2025, widespread opposition challenged President Trump's policies through street protests, electoral victories, and court rulings. Approval ratings for Trump dropped sharply amid economic struggles and controversial deportations. Legal experts highlight over 150 federal court blocks on his executive actions, though the Supreme Court offered mixed support.

 

 

 

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis