Rahm Emanuel backs mandatory retirement at 75 for federal officials, including presidents and judges

Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor and U.S. ambassador to Japan, said he supports a mandatory retirement age of 75 for federal public officials — a limit he said would apply to presidents, Cabinet members, members of Congress and federal judges, and would also constrain his own prospects if he runs for the White House.

Rahm Emanuel, 66, called on Wednesday for a mandatory retirement age of 75 for the president and other senior federal officials, arguing the cap should apply across all branches of government.

“You’re 75 years old: done,” Emanuel said at an event hosted by the Center for American Progress in Washington, according to POLITICO.

Emanuel said the cutoff should extend to the legislative branch, the executive branch — including the Cabinet — and the judiciary, including the Supreme Court and lower federal courts. He framed the idea as a way to force turnover in an era when the age of national leaders has become a recurring political issue.

Under the standard Emanuel described, President Donald Trump, 79, would be ineligible to serve, and former President Joe Biden would not have been able to complete his term, POLITICO reported. Emanuel also said the rule would affect 17 senators and 45 House members who are 75 or older.

Emanuel, seen as a potential 2028 presidential contender, acknowledged the proposal would limit him as well. He would be 69 when sworn in if he were elected in 2028, and 73 at the start of a second term, leaving him unable to serve a full second four-year term under the 75-year cutoff.

“I know where I am in my age. Of course it would apply to me,” Emanuel said, according to POLITICO. “You can’t say ‘here’s what I want to do to change Washington’ — but I get an exemption.”

Emanuel likened the proposed age limit to mandatory retirement rules in other sectors and joked that officials reaching the cap should find something else to do. “Go work on your golf swing, it’s not that good to begin with,” he said.

The proposal comes as public concerns about the age of national leaders have intensified in recent election cycles. Surveys in recent years have consistently found broad support for maximum age limits for federal elected officials and Supreme Court justices.

Emanuel said he would seek to enact the policy through legislation rather than through a constitutional amendment, though legal questions could arise because the Constitution sets minimum ages for federal elected offices but does not impose maximum ages, and gives federal judges lifetime tenure. POLITICO noted the idea could also face political resistance in a Senate with a median age around the mid-60s.

Emanuel also placed the age-limit proposal within a broader set of anti-corruption and ethics changes, including tighter restrictions on lobbying, gifts, and stock trading by public officials. He argued Democrats should make those issues central to their message, saying the current administration has “expanded” the “swamp” — language he used to turn President Trump’s signature campaign phrase back against him.

Emanuel’s choice of 75 echoes a widely discussed 2014 essay by his brother, Ezekiel Emanuel, an oncologist and former Obama administration adviser, who argued that living past 75 often brings more decline than benefit, POLITICO reported.

Was die Leute sagen

X discussions on Rahm Emanuel's proposal for a mandatory retirement age of 75 for federal officials including presidents and judges feature support from users praising it as a smart reform for fresh leadership across government branches. Skeptics highlight its self-serving nature, as it would bar Emanuel from a second presidential term. Critics label it political theater distracting from issues like term limits and wasteful spending. Journalists provide context emphasizing Emanuel's willingness to apply it to himself.

Verwandte Artikel

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu announces the suspension of the 2023 pension reform at a press conference, with French flags and documents in the background.
Bild generiert von KI

Französischer Premierminister suspendiert Rentenreform bis 2027

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

Der französische Premierminister Sébastien Lecornu hat die Aussetzung der Rentenreform von 2023 angekündigt und Diskussionen über Alter und Beitragsdauer bis nach der Präsidentschaftswahl 2027 verschoben. Die Maßnahme zielt darauf ab, das Budget inmitten demokratischer Misstrauenshaltung zu stabilisieren, löst aber Debatten über Auswirkungen auf Gleichheit und berufliche Ungleichheiten aus. Experten betonen, dass die Grundlagen der Reform unverändert bleiben, und fordern Korrekturen für Ungleichheiten, insbesondere bei Frauen und Senioren.

Eine Umfrage zeigt, dass die Hälfte der Deutschen ein Renteneintrittsalter, das an Beitragsjahre gekoppelt ist, ablehnt. Der Vorschlag des Ökonomen Jens Südekum stößt besonders bei Akademikern und Anhängern linker Parteien auf Skepsis. Politiker aus SPD und CSU zeigen sich jedoch offen für die Idee.

Von KI berichtet

Das Oberste Gericht (MA) hat eine Auswahlkommission gebildet, um einen Nachfolger für den Verfassungsrichter Anwar Usman zu finden, der Ende 2026 in den Ruhestand geht. MA-Präsident Sunarto betonte die Notwendigkeit eines Gleichgewichts zwischen Wissen und Glauben bei potenziellen Richtern. Der Auswahlprozess umfasst verschiedene Gemeindeführer und Akademiker.

Präsident Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva wurde am 27. Oktober 80 Jahre alt und ist damit der erste Octogenäre, der das Amt in Brasilien innehat. Er feierte den Anlass während eines offiziellen Besuchs in Malaysia, wo er am Asean-Gipfel teilnimmt. Lula erklärte, er habe die Energie, sich 2026 zur Wiederwahl zu stellen.

Von KI berichtet

Die Nationalversammlung hat am 12. November eine Regierungsänderung angenommen, die die Rentenreform von 2023 bis 2027 aussetzt, mit 255 Ja-Stimmen und 146 Nein-Stimmen. Diese Maßnahme, die von Sozialisten gefordert wurde, um eine Zensur zu vermeiden, spaltete die Linke, da die Insoumis dagegen stimmten zugunsten einer vollständigen Aufhebung. Die Debatten über den Sozialversicherungshaushalt endeten am 13. November um Mitternacht ohne Abstimmung und schickten den Text an den Senat.

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

Von KI berichtet

In 2025, widespread opposition challenged President Trump's policies through street protests, electoral victories, and court rulings. Approval ratings for Trump dropped sharply amid economic struggles and controversial deportations. Legal experts highlight over 150 federal court blocks on his executive actions, though the Supreme Court offered mixed support.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen