Rahm Emanuel backs mandatory retirement at 75 for federal officials, including presidents and judges

Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor and U.S. ambassador to Japan, said he supports a mandatory retirement age of 75 for federal public officials — a limit he said would apply to presidents, Cabinet members, members of Congress and federal judges, and would also constrain his own prospects if he runs for the White House.

Rahm Emanuel, 66, called on Wednesday for a mandatory retirement age of 75 for the president and other senior federal officials, arguing the cap should apply across all branches of government.

“You’re 75 years old: done,” Emanuel said at an event hosted by the Center for American Progress in Washington, according to POLITICO.

Emanuel said the cutoff should extend to the legislative branch, the executive branch — including the Cabinet — and the judiciary, including the Supreme Court and lower federal courts. He framed the idea as a way to force turnover in an era when the age of national leaders has become a recurring political issue.

Under the standard Emanuel described, President Donald Trump, 79, would be ineligible to serve, and former President Joe Biden would not have been able to complete his term, POLITICO reported. Emanuel also said the rule would affect 17 senators and 45 House members who are 75 or older.

Emanuel, seen as a potential 2028 presidential contender, acknowledged the proposal would limit him as well. He would be 69 when sworn in if he were elected in 2028, and 73 at the start of a second term, leaving him unable to serve a full second four-year term under the 75-year cutoff.

“I know where I am in my age. Of course it would apply to me,” Emanuel said, according to POLITICO. “You can’t say ‘here’s what I want to do to change Washington’ — but I get an exemption.”

Emanuel likened the proposed age limit to mandatory retirement rules in other sectors and joked that officials reaching the cap should find something else to do. “Go work on your golf swing, it’s not that good to begin with,” he said.

The proposal comes as public concerns about the age of national leaders have intensified in recent election cycles. Surveys in recent years have consistently found broad support for maximum age limits for federal elected officials and Supreme Court justices.

Emanuel said he would seek to enact the policy through legislation rather than through a constitutional amendment, though legal questions could arise because the Constitution sets minimum ages for federal elected offices but does not impose maximum ages, and gives federal judges lifetime tenure. POLITICO noted the idea could also face political resistance in a Senate with a median age around the mid-60s.

Emanuel also placed the age-limit proposal within a broader set of anti-corruption and ethics changes, including tighter restrictions on lobbying, gifts, and stock trading by public officials. He argued Democrats should make those issues central to their message, saying the current administration has “expanded” the “swamp” — language he used to turn President Trump’s signature campaign phrase back against him.

Emanuel’s choice of 75 echoes a widely discussed 2014 essay by his brother, Ezekiel Emanuel, an oncologist and former Obama administration adviser, who argued that living past 75 often brings more decline than benefit, POLITICO reported.

Cosa dice la gente

X discussions on Rahm Emanuel's proposal for a mandatory retirement age of 75 for federal officials including presidents and judges feature support from users praising it as a smart reform for fresh leadership across government branches. Skeptics highlight its self-serving nature, as it would bar Emanuel from a second presidential term. Critics label it political theater distracting from issues like term limits and wasteful spending. Journalists provide context emphasizing Emanuel's willingness to apply it to himself.

Articoli correlati

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu announces the suspension of the 2023 pension reform at a press conference, with French flags and documents in the background.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Il primo ministro francese sospende la riforma delle pensioni fino al 2027

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

Il primo ministro francese Sébastien Lecornu ha annunciato la sospensione della riforma delle pensioni del 2023, rinviando le discussioni su età e durata dei contributi fino dopo le elezioni presidenziali del 2027. La mossa mira a stabilizzare il bilancio in mezzo alla sfiducia democratica, ma scatena dibattito sulle implicazioni per l'uguaglianza e le disuguaglianze professionali. Gli esperti notano che le basi della riforma rimangono invariate, esortando a correzioni per le disparità, specialmente per donne e anziani.

A survey reveals that half of Germans reject linking the retirement age to contribution years. Economist Jens Südekum's proposal faces skepticism especially among academics and supporters of left-leaning parties. Politicians from SPD and CSU remain open to the idea.

Riportato dall'IA

The Supreme Court (MA) has formed a selection committee to find a replacement for Constitutional Court Justice Anwar Usman, who will retire at the end of 2026. MA Chief Justice Sunarto emphasized the need for a balance of knowledge and faith in prospective judges. The selection process involves various community figures and academics.

Il presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ha compiuto 80 anni il 27 ottobre, diventando il primo ottuagenario a ricoprire la carica in Brasile. Ha festeggiato l'occasione durante una visita ufficiale in Malesia, dove partecipa al summit Asean. Lula ha dichiarato di avere l'energia per candidarsi alla rielezione nel 2026.

Riportato dall'IA

L'Assemblea Nazionale ha adottato il 12 novembre un emendamento governativo che sospende la riforma delle pensioni del 2023 fino al 2027, con 255 voti a favore e 146 contrari. Questa misura, richiesta dai socialisti per evitare la censura, ha diviso la sinistra, poiché gli Insoumis hanno votato contro a favore di una revoca totale. I dibattiti sul bilancio della Sicurezza Sociale si sono conclusi a mezzanotte del 13 novembre senza voto, inviando il testo al Senato.

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

Riportato dall'IA

In 2025, widespread opposition challenged President Trump's policies through street protests, electoral victories, and court rulings. Approval ratings for Trump dropped sharply amid economic struggles and controversial deportations. Legal experts highlight over 150 federal court blocks on his executive actions, though the Supreme Court offered mixed support.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta