Dramatic illustration of US Supreme Court invalidating Trump's emergency tariffs, as he announces a new global 10% tariff.
Dramatic illustration of US Supreme Court invalidating Trump's emergency tariffs, as he announces a new global 10% tariff.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's emergency tariffs

Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

The US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The decision delivers a major setback to his trade policy and raises questions over deals with South Korea and others. Trump responded by ordering a new 10 percent global tariff.

The US Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026 (US time) in a 6-3 decision that President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs was unlawful. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion, "We hold that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs." The law allows regulation of commerce during national emergencies but lacks explicit reference to tariffs or duties.

Trump announced the reciprocal tariffs on April 2, 2025, dubbing it "Liberation Day," citing trade deficits as a national security threat. Tariffs on South Korean products were reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent under a bilateral deal where Seoul pledged $350 billion in US investments, among other commitments.

The ruling spares other measures like Section 232 tariffs but opens the door to refunds exceeding $175 billion. Penn Wharton Budget Model economists estimated potential refunds at over $175 billion. Businesses have filed more than 1,800 lawsuits, and the process is expected to be lengthy.

South Korea's presidential office, Cheong Wa Dae, stated it will review the decision and US position to respond in the national interest. Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said, "The overall export conditions secured through the Korea-US tariff agreement will largely remain intact." Trump immediately invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to impose a 10 percent global tariff for 150 days, on top of existing duties, with exemptions for certain goods.

The decision adds uncertainty to Trump's trade agenda amid midterm elections and affordability concerns. South Korean firms are unlikely to alter US investment plans but are preparing for further measures.

Apa yang dikatakan orang

Discussions on X reveal polarized sentiments following the US Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling against Trump's use of IEEPA for emergency tariffs. Critics celebrate it as a check on executive power and express outrage over Trump's new 10% global tariff response. Supporters view the decision as procedural, affirming other tariff authorities and praising Trump's pivot as strategic America First policy.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration depicting Supreme Court striking down Trump's broad tariffs as he signs a new 15% global tariff order amid political drama.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Mahkamah Agung memutuskan melawan tarif luas Trump

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Mahkamah Agung AS memutuskan 6-3 pada Jumat bahwa Presiden Trump tidak dapat menggunakan Undang-Undang Kekuasaan Darurat Ekonomi Internasional untuk memberlakukan tarif skala besar, memicu respons segera dari administrasi dan tokoh politik. Trump menandatangani tarif global 15% di bawah undang-undang berbeda keesokan harinya dan mengkritik pengadilan pada Senin. Putusan tersebut memicu perdebatan tentang implikasi politiknya menjelang midterm dan pidato State of the Union.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on Friday ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Trump responded by announcing new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, later raising them to 15 percent. The European Union has paused a recent trade deal with the US amid the resulting uncertainty.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

In a 6-3 decision, the US Supreme Court has struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, citing lack of congressional authorization. The ruling triggered a relief rally in financial markets, including a brief spike in Bitcoin to $68,000, though gains faded amid ongoing uncertainties. President Trump responded by announcing a new 10% global tariff under Section 122.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. This decision eliminates the reciprocal tariffs imposed so far, but it is not a reversal of US trade policy. For India, the importance of recent trade deals has increased.

Dilaporkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

Mahkamah Agung pada hari Rabu mendengar tantangan gabungan terhadap tarif “Hari Pembebasan” Presiden Trump. Hakim-hakim dari berbagai spektrum ideologis menekan apakah undang-undang kekuasaan darurat yang menjadi isu mengotorisasi bea masuk yang luas, meninggalkan hasil yang tidak pasti.

President Donald Trump warned the US Supreme Court that a ruling against his reciprocal tariffs would cause massive financial chaos, following his call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. In a Truth Social post, Trump stated that overturning the tariffs would require refunding hundreds of billions of dollars and impact trillions in investments. The Court, skeptical in a November hearing, could annul the measures announced in April 2025.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Pasar saham AS mengakhiri hari secara positif meskipun volatilitas yang dipicu oleh keputusan Mahkamah Agung tentang tarif dan data PDB kuartal keempat lebih lemah dari perkiraan. Putusan tersebut membatasi wewenang Presiden Donald Trump untuk memberlakukan tarif, beralih ke proses yang lebih terstruktur. Indeks utama rebound dan tutup hijau setelah pengumuman.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak