Dramatic illustration of US Supreme Court invalidating Trump's emergency tariffs, as he announces a new global 10% tariff.
Dramatic illustration of US Supreme Court invalidating Trump's emergency tariffs, as he announces a new global 10% tariff.
Изображение, созданное ИИ

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's emergency tariffs

Изображение, созданное ИИ

The US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The decision delivers a major setback to his trade policy and raises questions over deals with South Korea and others. Trump responded by ordering a new 10 percent global tariff.

The US Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026 (US time) in a 6-3 decision that President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs was unlawful. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion, "We hold that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs." The law allows regulation of commerce during national emergencies but lacks explicit reference to tariffs or duties.

Trump announced the reciprocal tariffs on April 2, 2025, dubbing it "Liberation Day," citing trade deficits as a national security threat. Tariffs on South Korean products were reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent under a bilateral deal where Seoul pledged $350 billion in US investments, among other commitments.

The ruling spares other measures like Section 232 tariffs but opens the door to refunds exceeding $175 billion. Penn Wharton Budget Model economists estimated potential refunds at over $175 billion. Businesses have filed more than 1,800 lawsuits, and the process is expected to be lengthy.

South Korea's presidential office, Cheong Wa Dae, stated it will review the decision and US position to respond in the national interest. Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said, "The overall export conditions secured through the Korea-US tariff agreement will largely remain intact." Trump immediately invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to impose a 10 percent global tariff for 150 days, on top of existing duties, with exemptions for certain goods.

The decision adds uncertainty to Trump's trade agenda amid midterm elections and affordability concerns. South Korean firms are unlikely to alter US investment plans but are preparing for further measures.

Что говорят люди

Discussions on X reveal polarized sentiments following the US Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling against Trump's use of IEEPA for emergency tariffs. Critics celebrate it as a check on executive power and express outrage over Trump's new 10% global tariff response. Supporters view the decision as procedural, affirming other tariff authorities and praising Trump's pivot as strategic America First policy.

Связанные статьи

Illustration depicting Supreme Court striking down Trump's broad tariffs as he signs a new 15% global tariff order amid political drama.
Изображение, созданное ИИ

Supreme Court rules against Trump's broad tariffs

Сообщено ИИ Изображение, созданное ИИ

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Trump cannot use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose broad-scale tariffs, prompting immediate responses from the administration and political figures. Trump signed a 15% global tariff under a different law the next day and criticized the court on Monday. The decision has sparked debates over its political implications ahead of the midterms and the State of the Union address.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on Friday ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Trump responded by announcing new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, later raising them to 15 percent. The European Union has paused a recent trade deal with the US amid the resulting uncertainty.

Сообщено ИИ

In a 6-3 decision, the US Supreme Court has struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, citing lack of congressional authorization. The ruling triggered a relief rally in financial markets, including a brief spike in Bitcoin to $68,000, though gains faded amid ongoing uncertainties. President Trump responded by announcing a new 10% global tariff under Section 122.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. This decision eliminates the reciprocal tariffs imposed so far, but it is not a reversal of US trade policy. For India, the importance of recent trade deals has increased.

Сообщено ИИ Проверено фактами

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard consolidated challenges to President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. Justices across the ideological spectrum pressed whether the emergency‑powers law at issue authorizes sweeping import duties, leaving the outcome uncertain.

President Donald Trump warned the US Supreme Court that a ruling against his reciprocal tariffs would cause massive financial chaos, following his call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. In a Truth Social post, Trump stated that overturning the tariffs would require refunding hundreds of billions of dollars and impact trillions in investments. The Court, skeptical in a November hearing, could annul the measures announced in April 2025.

Сообщено ИИ

The U.S. stock market ended the day positively despite volatility triggered by a Supreme Court decision on tariffs and weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter GDP data. The ruling limited President Donald Trump's authority to impose tariffs, shifting to a more structured process. Major indices rallied and closed in the green following the announcement.

 

 

 

Этот сайт использует куки

Мы используем куки для анализа, чтобы улучшить наш сайт. Прочитайте нашу политику конфиденциальности для дополнительной информации.
Отклонить