Delhi High Court: no right to choose specific school under RTE

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Right to Education (RTE) Act does not confer on students the right to choose a particular school. It dismissed a petition by a woman seeking admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

In New Delhi, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed by a woman. She had sought admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

The court observed that while the Right to Education (RTE) Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at ensuring access to education, “it does not confer a right on a student to choose a particular school.”

The ruling clarifies the limits of students' rights under RTE, which primarily focuses on access to education.

Related Articles

Somber NCERT officials withdrawing controversial class 8 social science textbook banned by Supreme Court over judicial corruption chapter.
Image generated by AI

NCERT withdraws class 8 social science textbook over judiciary chapter

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has withdrawn its newly released class 8 social science textbook following controversy over a chapter on judicial corruption. The Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its further publication and dissemination. NCERT expressed regret for the unintentional inclusion of inappropriate content.

Maharashtra's school education department has announced that admissions under the Right to Education (RTE) Act will begin on February 17 under a revised process. Parents must now select up to 10 private unaided schools within a one-kilometre radius of the student's registered home. Parents are opposing the changes due to delays and limited choices.

Reported by AI

In November, the Delhi High Court ruled that no law student can be barred from exams due to insufficient attendance. This decision has ignited debate on academic rigour and classroom teaching in higher education. Critics argue it undermines the essential role of physical classes.

The Kerala High Court has halted the state's Nava Kerala Citizen Response Programme, citing violations of financial rules and its timing before elections. The programme involved a door-to-door survey funded by government money. Petitioners claimed it was a political campaign in disguise.

Reported by AI

India's Supreme Court on Tuesday asked West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee what her legal reaction would be if, by 2030-2031, her party held power at the Centre and an opposing Chief Minister disrupted a central agency raid. The question arose during a hearing on the Enforcement Directorate's petition over a January raid interruption. The bench raised concerns about state interference in central probes.

A controversial chapter in the Class 8 NCERT social science textbook mentioning corruption in the judiciary was written by a committee including a lawyer but was not reviewed by any legal experts, officials said on Thursday. The Supreme Court has called for action against those who wrote the chapter, and Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan has promised strict measures.

Reported by AI

The Supreme Court is set to hear a suo motu case over the inclusion of a chapter on corruption in the judiciary in NCERT's Class 8 Social Science textbook. NCERT has apologised for the inappropriate textual material and stopped the book's distribution. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will conduct the hearing on February 26, 2026.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline