Delhi High Court: no right to choose specific school under RTE

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Right to Education (RTE) Act does not confer on students the right to choose a particular school. It dismissed a petition by a woman seeking admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

In New Delhi, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed by a woman. She had sought admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

The court observed that while the Right to Education (RTE) Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at ensuring access to education, “it does not confer a right on a student to choose a particular school.”

The ruling clarifies the limits of students' rights under RTE, which primarily focuses on access to education.

Relaterede artikler

Somber NCERT officials withdrawing controversial class 8 social science textbook banned by Supreme Court over judicial corruption chapter.
Billede genereret af AI

NCERT withdraws class 8 social science textbook over judiciary chapter

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has withdrawn its newly released class 8 social science textbook following controversy over a chapter on judicial corruption. The Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its further publication and dissemination. NCERT expressed regret for the unintentional inclusion of inappropriate content.

Maharashtra's school education department has announced that admissions under the Right to Education (RTE) Act will begin on February 17 under a revised process. Parents must now select up to 10 private unaided schools within a one-kilometre radius of the student's registered home. Parents are opposing the changes due to delays and limited choices.

Rapporteret af AI

In November, the Delhi High Court ruled that no law student can be barred from exams due to insufficient attendance. This decision has ignited debate on academic rigour and classroom teaching in higher education. Critics argue it undermines the essential role of physical classes.

India's Supreme Court on Tuesday asked West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee what her legal reaction would be if, by 2030-2031, her party held power at the Centre and an opposing Chief Minister disrupted a central agency raid. The question arose during a hearing on the Enforcement Directorate's petition over a January raid interruption. The bench raised concerns about state interference in central probes.

Rapporteret af AI

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a petition by former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti on Tuesday, seeking the transfer of undertrials from J&K imprisoned outside the union territory to local jails. The court cited ambiguity and political motives behind the plea. The petition also demanded access protocols for families and lawyers.

The Supreme Court is set to hear a suo motu case over the inclusion of a chapter on corruption in the judiciary in NCERT's Class 8 Social Science textbook. NCERT has apologised for the inappropriate textual material and stopped the book's distribution. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will conduct the hearing on February 26, 2026.

Rapporteret af AI

Senator Raffy Tulfo has scrutinized the Department of Education's Expanded Government Assistance to Students and Teachers in Private Education (E-GASTPE) program, claiming abuse by some officials. During a Senate committee hearing, he demanded proper vetting to ensure aid reaches truly qualified students from congested public schools.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis