Delhi High Court: no right to choose specific school under RTE

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Right to Education (RTE) Act does not confer on students the right to choose a particular school. It dismissed a petition by a woman seeking admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

In New Delhi, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed by a woman. She had sought admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

The court observed that while the Right to Education (RTE) Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at ensuring access to education, “it does not confer a right on a student to choose a particular school.”

The ruling clarifies the limits of students' rights under RTE, which primarily focuses on access to education.

Связанные статьи

Supreme Court of India scene with disappointed West Bengal election staff and vibrant polling booth crowds highlighting high turnout.
Изображение, созданное ИИ

Supreme Court directs 65 Bengal poll duty staff to approach tribunals

Сообщено ИИ Изображение, созданное ИИ

India's Supreme Court directed petitioners, including 65 on election duty in West Bengal whose names were deleted from the voter list after Special Intensive Revision (SIR), to approach appellate tribunals. The court refused their plea for immediate voting rights. It also praised the record 92.88% turnout and peaceful polling in the first phase.

The Delhi High Court has ruled that aspirants from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) cannot seek parity with SC/ST/OBC candidates for relaxations in upper age limits or number of attempts in Central government appointments. Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan noted that the handicaps faced by socially backward and economically deprived classes differ.

Сообщено ИИ

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has withdrawn its newly released class 8 social science textbook following controversy over a chapter on judicial corruption. The Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its further publication and dissemination. NCERT expressed regret for the unintentional inclusion of inappropriate content.

Сообщено ИИ

A labor court suspended the application of article 101 of the labor reform, which declared education an essential service. The precautionary measure, filed by the Unión Docentes Argentinos union, frees teaching unions from maintaining 75% staff during strikes. The ruling applies fully to the education sector until the merits are resolved.

The Supreme Court is set to hear a suo motu case over the inclusion of a chapter on corruption in the judiciary in NCERT's Class 8 Social Science textbook. NCERT has apologised for the inappropriate textual material and stopped the book's distribution. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will conduct the hearing on February 26, 2026.

Сообщено ИИ

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed appeals challenging the Madras High Court order directing a CBI investigation into an alleged Rs 397 crore scam involving the purchase of transformers by TANGEDCO between 2021 and 2023.

 

 

 

Этот сайт использует куки

Мы используем куки для анализа, чтобы улучшить наш сайт. Прочитайте нашу политику конфиденциальности для дополнительной информации.
Отклонить