Delhi High Court: no right to choose specific school under RTE

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Right to Education (RTE) Act does not confer on students the right to choose a particular school. It dismissed a petition by a woman seeking admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

In New Delhi, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed by a woman. She had sought admission for her daughter in a private school under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

The court observed that while the Right to Education (RTE) Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at ensuring access to education, “it does not confer a right on a student to choose a particular school.”

The ruling clarifies the limits of students' rights under RTE, which primarily focuses on access to education.

관련 기사

Somber NCERT officials withdrawing controversial class 8 social science textbook banned by Supreme Court over judicial corruption chapter.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

NCERT withdraws class 8 social science textbook over judiciary chapter

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has withdrawn its newly released class 8 social science textbook following controversy over a chapter on judicial corruption. The Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its further publication and dissemination. NCERT expressed regret for the unintentional inclusion of inappropriate content.

Maharashtra's school education department has announced that admissions under the Right to Education (RTE) Act will begin on February 17 under a revised process. Parents must now select up to 10 private unaided schools within a one-kilometre radius of the student's registered home. Parents are opposing the changes due to delays and limited choices.

AI에 의해 보고됨

In November, the Delhi High Court ruled that no law student can be barred from exams due to insufficient attendance. This decision has ignited debate on academic rigour and classroom teaching in higher education. Critics argue it undermines the essential role of physical classes.

India's Supreme Court on Tuesday asked West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee what her legal reaction would be if, by 2030-2031, her party held power at the Centre and an opposing Chief Minister disrupted a central agency raid. The question arose during a hearing on the Enforcement Directorate's petition over a January raid interruption. The bench raised concerns about state interference in central probes.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a petition by former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti on Tuesday, seeking the transfer of undertrials from J&K imprisoned outside the union territory to local jails. The court cited ambiguity and political motives behind the plea. The petition also demanded access protocols for families and lawyers.

The Supreme Court is set to hear a suo motu case over the inclusion of a chapter on corruption in the judiciary in NCERT's Class 8 Social Science textbook. NCERT has apologised for the inappropriate textual material and stopped the book's distribution. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will conduct the hearing on February 26, 2026.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Raffy Tulfo 상원의원이 교육부의 Expanded Government Assistance to Students and Teachers in Private Education (E-GASTPE) 프로그램을 검토하며 일부 관리들의 남용을 주장했다. 상원 위원회 청문회에서 그는 지원이 과밀 공립학교 출신의 진정한 자격을 갖춘 학생들에게 도달하도록 적절한 심사를 요구했다.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부