Tribunal Superior de Delhi: no existe el derecho a elegir una escuela específica bajo la Ley RTE

El Tribunal Superior de Delhi ha dictaminado que la Ley de Derecho a la Educación (RTE) no otorga a los estudiantes el derecho a elegir una escuela en particular. Desestimó la petición de una mujer que buscaba la admisión de su hija en un colegio privado bajo la categoría de Sección Económicamente Débil (EWS).

En Nueva Delhi, el Tribunal Superior de Delhi desestimó una petición presentada por una mujer. Ella había solicitado la admisión de su hija en una escuela privada bajo la categoría de Sección Económicamente Débil (EWS). El tribunal observó que, si bien la Ley de Derecho a la Educación (RTE) es una legislación beneficiosa destinada a garantizar el acceso a la enseñanza, “no confiere al estudiante el derecho a elegir una escuela en particular”. El fallo aclara los límites de los derechos de los estudiantes bajo la RTE, la cual se centra principalmente en el acceso a la educación.

Artículos relacionados

Supreme Court of India scene with disappointed West Bengal election staff and vibrant polling booth crowds highlighting high turnout.
Imagen generada por IA

Supreme Court directs 65 Bengal poll duty staff to approach tribunals

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA

India's Supreme Court directed petitioners, including 65 on election duty in West Bengal whose names were deleted from the voter list after Special Intensive Revision (SIR), to approach appellate tribunals. The court refused their plea for immediate voting rights. It also praised the record 92.88% turnout and peaceful polling in the first phase.

The Delhi High Court has ruled that aspirants from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) cannot seek parity with SC/ST/OBC candidates for relaxations in upper age limits or number of attempts in Central government appointments. Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan noted that the handicaps faced by socially backward and economically deprived classes differ.

Reportado por IA

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has withdrawn its newly released class 8 social science textbook following controversy over a chapter on judicial corruption. The Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its further publication and dissemination. NCERT expressed regret for the unintentional inclusion of inappropriate content.

Reportado por IA

A labor court suspended the application of article 101 of the labor reform, which declared education an essential service. The precautionary measure, filed by the Unión Docentes Argentinos union, frees teaching unions from maintaining 75% staff during strikes. The ruling applies fully to the education sector until the merits are resolved.

The Supreme Court is set to hear a suo motu case over the inclusion of a chapter on corruption in the judiciary in NCERT's Class 8 Social Science textbook. NCERT has apologised for the inappropriate textual material and stopped the book's distribution. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will conduct the hearing on February 26, 2026.

Reportado por IA

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed appeals challenging the Madras High Court order directing a CBI investigation into an alleged Rs 397 crore scam involving the purchase of transformers by TANGEDCO between 2021 and 2023.

 

 

 

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar