Illustration depicting Florida Attorney General filing lawsuit against proxy advisers ISS and Glass Lewis over DEI and ESG agendas in a courtroom setting.
Illustration depicting Florida Attorney General filing lawsuit against proxy advisers ISS and Glass Lewis over DEI and ESG agendas in a courtroom setting.
Image generated by AI

Florida sues proxy advisers ISS and Glass Lewis over alleged DEI, ESG influence

Image generated by AI
Fact checked

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a state-court lawsuit Thursday against Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis, accusing the firms of violating Florida consumer-protection and antitrust laws by using their market power to advance diversity, equity and inclusion and climate-related agendas, according to a copy of the complaint reviewed by The Daily Wire.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier on Thursday, Nov. 20, filed suit against Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, alleging the proxy advisers used their influence to promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies in violation of state consumer-protection and antitrust laws, according to The Daily Wire’s review of the complaint. The Daily Wire reported the case was filed in Florida’s Second Judicial Circuit; a separate local outlet, Florida’s Voice, said it was filed in the 14th Judicial Circuit. (dailywire.com)

ISS and Glass Lewis dominate the U.S. proxy advisory market—a share commonly estimated at more than 90%, with some analyses placing it near 97%, though ISS has challenged the precision of the 97% figure. (congress.gov)

“The defendants have used this enormous influence to push their own dogmatic agenda,” the complaint says, asserting the firms press companies toward “racial balancing,” gender-related policies, and climate requirements. Those characterizations reflect the lawsuit’s arguments; the firms’ published voting policies show they sometimes recommend voting against board committee chairs when certain diversity or climate-risk oversight benchmarks are not met. For example, Glass Lewis generally recommends against the nominating committee chair at Russell 1000 companies lacking at least one director from an “underrepresented community,” a term it defines to include certain racial and ethnic groups and LGBTQIA+ individuals, and it may oppose boards that fail to disclose climate-oversight roles. ISS guidelines say it will generally recommend against the nominating chair at companies with no women on the board and, for significant greenhouse-gas emitters, may recommend against directors if a company has not taken “minimum steps” on climate risk, including TCFD-aligned disclosure and appropriate emissions targets. (resources.glasslewis.com)

Both firms are under Federal Trade Commission scrutiny for potential antitrust issues, according to a Wall Street Journal report cited by Reuters. (reuters.com)

Uthmeier, who became Florida’s attorney general in February 2025, said Florida would no longer allow “two unaccountable foreign-owned private corporations to manipulate shareholder votes behind closed doors,” adding that the state views the firms’ influence as a threat to retiree savings and corporate governance. His comments were made to The Daily Wire. ISS is majority-owned by Germany’s Deutsche Börse Group; Glass Lewis is owned by Canada-based Peloton Capital Management and investor Stephen Smith. (dailywire.com)

The lawsuit also cites prior congressional scrutiny. In August 2023, the House Judiciary Committee sought documents from the firms as part of an inquiry into whether proxy advisers collaborated with outside groups to push companies to “decarbonize.” Subsequent hearings in 2025 continued to examine the proxy advisory market’s concentration and influence. (hrpolicy.org)

Consumers’ Research executive director Will Hild praised the filing, saying his group would support aggressive enforcement until the firms commit to “transparency” and “neutrality,” according to The Daily Wire. (dailywire.com)

Background: In March 2025, Uthmeier’s office announced an investigation into ISS and Glass Lewis under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and Florida’s Antitrust Act—allegations that mirror the new complaint. (myfloridalegal.com)

What people are saying

Initial reactions on X to Florida's lawsuit against ISS and Glass Lewis are predominantly supportive, with conservative figures and organizations praising the action as a defense against the firms' alleged promotion of DEI and ESG agendas that harm shareholders and retirees. Official announcements highlight antitrust and consumer protection concerns, while some users express gratitude for the move. Broader skepticism toward the proxy advisors' unchecked influence is evident, though direct criticism of the lawsuit itself is limited.

Related Articles

Illustration of corporate professionals discussing rebranded DEI programs amid Trump's crackdown, highlighting persistence in diversity efforts.
Image generated by AI

Despite Trump’s DEI crackdown, corporate and campus efforts persist — often under new names

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14151 directs federal agencies to terminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Companion bills to dismantle DEI were introduced in Congress on February 4, 2025. Yet surveys and institutional reports indicate many companies and universities are maintaining — or rebranding — related efforts.

On Monday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a legal opinion declaring over 100 state laws and policies incorporating DEI frameworks unconstitutional, urging their immediate abolition. In a parallel move, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced that dozens of affirmative action programs in state law violate the U.S. and Florida constitutions, stating his office will no longer defend or enforce them. Both actions cite the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling against race-based college admissions as precedent.

Reported by AI

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has introduced rules that limit small investors' ability to influence corporate climate policies through shareholder proposals and communications. These changes, announced in November and January, aim to reduce regulatory burdens but raise concerns among activists about diminished corporate accountability. Critics argue the moves could sideline voices pushing for environmental action at major firms.

A new report from the American Energy Institute alerts lawmakers to a coordinated activist network aiming to restrict American energy development. The document, sent to Republican leaders this week, details efforts by environmental groups to influence policy and challenge projects. It highlights potential risks to national energy independence amid ongoing political debates.

Reported by AI Fact checked

A new national survey by the EU‑US Forum, first shared with the Daily Wire, finds that many likely U.S. general‑election voters favor the Trump administration using trade negotiations to shield American companies from two European Union sustainability directives. The poll reports 57% see the rules as unfair to U.S. firms, 71% say they would raise costs for American families, and nearly six in ten want officials to use trade talks to counter them.

Florida investors have filed a class action lawsuit against law firm Alston & Bird, accusing it of playing an essential role in a $328 million cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme run by Goliath Ventures. The complaint claims the firm drafted contracts and provided misleading legal advice that enabled the fraud. CEO Christopher Alexander Delgado faces federal charges for wire fraud and money laundering.

Reported by AI Fact checked

The U.S. Justice Department has proposed a regulation that would require state bar authorities to pause investigative steps against current or former DOJ attorneys for alleged ethics violations tied to their federal duties while the department conducts its own review. The proposal, published as a notice of proposed rulemaking on March 5, 2026, cites the McDade Amendment as its legal basis and says the change is needed amid what it describes as increasingly politicized bar complaints.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline