Plaintiffs seek to hold Argentina in contempt in YPF lawsuit

Plaintiffs in the YPF expropriation lawsuit have asked Judge Loretta Preska to hold the Republic of Argentina in contempt for failing to provide personal text messages and emails from officials. This request is part of a discovery process to prove that the State and the oil company operate as a single entity. However, the judge recently suspended a prior order favoring the plaintiffs, offering temporary relief to Argentina.

In the lawsuit over the 2012 YPF expropriation, beneficiaries of the court ruling, led by the firm Burford Capital, filed a motion with New York federal judge Loretta Preska. They seek sanctions and a contempt order against Argentina if it continues refusing to hand over personal communications from officials and former officials, as part of the 'alter ego' discovery process. This aims to show that the Argentine State and YPF operate as one entity, enabling potential seizures of assets like the Central Bank or Aerolíneas Argentinas.

According to lawyer Sebastián Soler, 'the government argues that, as these are communications via personal accounts and devices, they can only be provided if the individuals consent.' Some have consented, but others, such as Economy Minister Luis Caputo and Foreign Minister Pablo Quirno, refuse. The plaintiffs propose a schedule of informative filings from January 15 to March 5, 2026, to address this motion.

A positive development for Argentina came on December 23, 2025, when Preska suspended a prior order allowing investigation of YPF assets potentially subject to embargo. Specialist Sebastián Maril of Latam Advisors called it a 'Christmas gift for YPF,' as it temporarily halts that asset search. However, Maril noted that 'this order does not apply to discovery against other sovereign assets, which remains in effect.'

The case highlights tensions in repaying the debt from the expropriation, estimated in billions of dollars, and its implications for Argentina's economic sovereignty.

Related Articles

Former President Zapatero in courtroom filing privacy request with judge.
Image generated by AI

Zapatero asks judge for measures to protect privacy and limit investigation

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The defense of former president José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has filed briefs before Judge José Luis Calama to protect his privacy after leaks and to limit the scope of the Plus Ultra case.

The lawyer for José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has filed a document with the judge in the Plus Ultra case requesting detailed information on how the US obtained the contents of the mobile phone belonging to businessman Rodolfo Reyes Rojas.

Reported by AI

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rejected Argentina's appeal and confirmed the obligation to pay nearly 391 million dollars to Titan Consortium for the 2008 expropriation of Aerolíneas Argentinas.

The Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca has backed the Consejo de Estado ruling that suspends transfers of funds from AFP private pension administrators to Colpensiones. The decision drew criticism from President Gustavo Petro and Labor Minister Antonio Sanguino. Colpensiones stated that resources belonging to 129,000 people who switched regimes must be moved to cover pension payments.

Reported by AI

The National Government filed an appeal before the Council of State to reverse the provisional suspension of a $25 trillion transfer from private funds to Colpensiones. The precautionary measure was issued on April 28 against Decree 415 of 2026. The ministries defend the decree's legality within the pension reform framework.

The Sala II of the Cámara de Apelación en lo Civil, Comercial y Laboral of Rafaela suspended the bidding process for SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitada assets. The measure responds to an appeal filed by FIDULAC S.A., a company of businessman Gustavo Scaglione.

Reported by AI

The Fourth Criminal Circuit Court of Neiva declared the criminal action for ideological falsehood extinguished against engineer Erika Fernández Figueroa. The decision was made on July 10, 2026, after eight years of delays in the case over the 2016 collapse of the western stand.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline