Prosecutors criticize GENIUS Act for aiding crypto fraud

New York prosecutors have warned that the GENIUS Act, a new law regulating stablecoins, fails to protect fraud victims and allows issuers to profit from stolen funds. In a letter to key senators, Attorney General Letitia James and District Attorney Alvin Bragg argue the legislation provides legal cover to companies like Tether and Circle. They claim these firms resist returning seized assets, prioritizing their own financial gains.

The GENIUS Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump in July, establishes a regulatory framework for stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to stable assets like the US dollar. It requires issuers to back their coins one-for-one with liquid reserves, such as dollars or short-term Treasuries, aiming to bring order to the booming digital asset market. Stablecoin transaction volumes surged 72% last year to $33 trillion, outpacing even bitcoin's trading, according to Artemis Analytics data cited by Bloomberg News.

However, in an exclusive letter seen by CNN, New York Attorney General Letitia James and four district attorneys, including Manhattan's Alvin Bragg, decry the law's shortcomings. They argue it lacks mandates for companies to return stolen funds to victims, instead offering "imprimatur of legitimacy" while enabling firms to evade rules against terrorism financing, drug trafficking, money laundering, and fraud.

The prosecutors spotlight Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer by volume and based in El Salvador, and Circle, the second-largest and a New York-headquartered public company. Tether can freeze its USDT transactions but does so only ad hoc and mainly with federal law enforcement, the letter states. "The reality for many victims, therefore, is that funds stolen in or converted to USDT will never be frozen, seized, or returned," it warns.

Tether responded that it maintains a "zero-tolerance policy toward illicit activity" and voluntarily assists investigations at all levels. For Circle, the criticism is sharper: even when freezing funds, it allegedly hoards them to earn interest rather than returning them. Prosecutors estimate Circle held over $114 million in frozen funds as of November and that both firms profited $1 billion each in 2024 from reserve investments, including those backing stolen assets.

Circle's chief strategy officer, Dante Disparte, countered that the company prioritizes financial integrity and complies with US rules, noting the GENIUS Act enhances consumer protections. The letter, addressed to Senators Chuck Schumer, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Mark Warner, highlights how stablecoins now represent 63% of illicit crypto transactions, per Chainalysis, with blockchain crime growing 25% annually since 2020.

A spokesperson for Senator Warner emphasized that issuers must cooperate with law enforcement under the act and that Congress is assessing further tools to aid victims. Critics like American University law professor Hilary J. Allen argue the law overlooks basic consumer safeguards long established in traditional finance.

Related Articles

Senators Grassley and Durbin scrutinize crypto bill amid jurisdiction clash, with blockchain and law enforcement symbols.
Image generated by AI

Senate judiciary leaders challenge crypto bill's jurisdiction

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

Senate Judiciary Committee leaders Chuck Grassley and Dick Durbin have raised concerns about a provision in a cryptocurrency market structure bill led by Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott, arguing it encroaches on their committee's jurisdiction. The dispute centers on exemptions for crypto software developers, which they say could hinder law enforcement efforts against money laundering. The bill's markup has been postponed amid this opposition and industry pushback.

U.S. Representative Warren Davidson has warned that the GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, is pushing the cryptocurrency industry toward greater surveillance and centralization. He argues that the legislation favors banks and erodes Bitcoin's decentralized principles, contributing to stagnant U.S. markets. Davidson also highlighted delays in the CLARITY Act as exacerbating regulatory uncertainty.

Reported by AI

Under the Trump administration, U.S. regulators have shifted toward integrating cryptocurrency into the traditional financial system, marking a historic change from prior enforcement-heavy approaches. Key developments include new legislation for stablecoins and approvals for crypto firms to operate like banks. This evolution has boosted institutional adoption amid Bitcoin's volatile but upward price trajectory.

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee has postponed a key vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, amid disagreements over stablecoin provisions and opposition from Coinbase. The delay, originally set for January 15, 2026, highlights tensions between crypto innovators and regulators. While the White House has reportedly threatened to withdraw support, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong refuted such rumors, praising the administration's constructive role.

Reported by AI

Law enforcement agencies across several U.S. states are increasingly seizing cryptocurrencies linked to criminal activities, even in the absence of specific legislation. Connecticut and Texas have enacted laws explicitly allowing such forfeitures, while other states rely on broader existing statutes. Challenges persist in compensating victims amid volatile asset values.

Two U.S. Senate committees have scheduled simultaneous markup sessions for January 15 on legislation to regulate cryptocurrency markets, aiming to clarify oversight between the SEC and CFTC. Bipartisan negotiations are showing early progress on key issues like decentralized finance, though concerns persist over stablecoin yields and investor protections. The push comes amid efforts to advance a unified bill toward a potential floor vote.

Reported by AI

Coinbase, the largest US crypto exchange, abruptly pulled its support for the Senate's version of the CLARITY Act, leading to the cancellation of a key markup session. The move, announced hours before the planned vote, has drawn sharp criticism from industry leaders and the White House, who view it as a setback for bipartisan crypto regulation. CEO Brian Armstrong cited concerns over provisions that could hinder innovation and favor traditional banks.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline