House Justice Committee in session announcing impeachment hearings for VP Sara Duterte on March 25 following her 'non-answer' to complaints.
House Justice Committee in session announcing impeachment hearings for VP Sara Duterte on March 25 following her 'non-answer' to complaints.
Billede genereret af AI

House justice committee sets impeachment hearings for VP Sara Duterte on March 25 after 'non-answer'

Billede genereret af AI

Following the House justice committee's order for Vice President Sara Duterte to respond to impeachment complaints alleging misuse of confidential funds and threats against officials, the panel plans proper hearings starting March 25. This comes after her response was deemed a 'non-answer' and complainants waived their right to reply.

In the latest development in the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, she submitted her verified answer to the complaints on March 16, 2026. However, it failed to address the material allegations—instead questioning the House proceedings' integrity and noting the swift dismissal of complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.—prompting complainants to label it a 'non-answer' and waive their reply.

Complainants, including a group led by Rev. Fr. Joel Saballa (represented by lawyer Amando Virgil Ligutan) and Nathaniel Cabrera, argued in their pleading: 'respondent’s 15-page Consolidated Verified Answer conspicuously failed to specifically deny each and every material allegation in the 98-page impeachment complaint.'

At the committee's fourth meeting on March 18, chairperson Rep. Gerville Luistro (Batangas 2nd district) announced hearings proper would begin March 25. 'The allegations in the complaint stand because they were never rebutted in the answer of the respondent,' Luistro told 'Storycon' on One News, describing the response as 'more of a motion to dismiss.' She noted potential Supreme Court challenges but affirmed proceedings would continue without a restraining order.

The panel will first handle preliminary matters like subpoenas for bank records. Manila 3rd district Rep. Joel Chua added: 'The Filipino people deserve the truth. What we see in the Verified Answer is not a direct response to the allegations, but an attempt to avoid a full discussion of the evidence.'

Duterte's lawyer Michael Poa alleged a 'double standard' versus Marcos complaints, which Luistro refuted, citing clear evidence of Duterte's personal involvement, including threats against President Marcos, First Lady Liza Marcos, and former Speaker Martin Romualdez.

This follows the committee's March 5 order for a 10-day response after deeming the complaints sufficient.

Hvad folk siger

Discussions on X focus on the House justice committee's plan for impeachment hearings against VP Sara Duterte starting March 25 after labeling her response a 'non-answer' and receiving waivers from complainants. Pro-impeachment users criticize her failure to address confidential funds allegations. Supporters defend her reply as legally robust and accuse the committee of double standards. Media posts report procedural updates with moderate engagement.

Relaterede artikler

House justice committee holds first impeachment hearing for VP Sara Duterte without her or lawyers present, focusing on procedural agenda and audit evidence.
Billede genereret af AI

House proceeds with VP Sara Duterte impeachment hearing on March 25

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

The House justice committee proceeds with the first impeachment hearing against Vice President Sara Duterte on March 25, 2026, despite her and her lawyers' absence. The agenda includes ground rules, pending motions, subpoenas, and witnesses for the April 14 public hearing. Officials stress the proceedings are evidence-based from official audit findings.

Vice President Sara Duterte was formally ordered on Thursday, March 5, to respond to two impeachment complaints filed against her at the House of Representatives. The Office of the Vice President received the notice from the House justice committee at its headquarters in Mandaluyong City. She has a non-extendible 10-day period to file a verified answer.

Rapporteret af AI

The House Committee on Justice ruled on March 4, 2026, that the two impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte—filed in early February and transmitted to the Speaker's office—are sufficient in substance, voting 54-1 to advance proceedings. Duterte has 10 days to respond. Separately, she filed a perjury complaint against former intelligence officer Ramil Madriaga, whose affidavit supported the complaints.

Vice President Sara Duterte's defense team labeled the House committee on justice's 'mini-trial' as unconstitutional following her decision to skip the initial hearing on two remaining impeachment complaints.

Rapporteret af AI

Petitioners and endorsers of the second impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte have withdrawn their support and are now backing the third complaint filed by clergy members and lawyers. This occurs as the House justice committee begins proceedings on March 2, 2026. The move aims to expedite the process toward accountability.

The Supreme Court has reshaped how future impeachment cases will be initiated and assessed by ruling Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment unconstitutional. In its July 25, 2025 decision, the high court cited the House’s inaction and lack of due process as grounds for voiding it. It also laid down new standards for impeachments going forward.

Rapporteret af AI

Unlike complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte, the impeachment complaint against President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. was sent to the House speaker's office just two days after filing. House Secretary General Cheloy Velicaria-Garafil confirmed this on January 21. The swift transmission raises questions about whether it benefits the president against future complaints.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis