Kamala Harris discusses Epstein files on Jimmy Kimmel appearance

Former Vice President Kamala Harris gave a rambling response when questioned about the Biden administration's decision not to release Epstein files during a recent appearance on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!'. She emphasized the separation between the administration and the Department of Justice. The exchange highlights ongoing scrutiny over the handling of those documents.

Kamala Harris, appearing on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' this week, faced questions about why the Biden administration did not release documents related to Jeffrey Epstein while in office. Host Jimmy Kimmel directly asked Harris about the matter, prompting a response that Harris herself acknowledged might not satisfy curiosity.

"To give you an answer that will not satisfy your curiosity, I will tell you, perhaps to our damage, um, but we strongly and rightly believed that there should be an absolute separation between what we wanted as an administration and what the Department of Justice did. We absolutely adhered to that, and it was right to do that," Harris said. She added, "The Justice Department would make its decisions independent of any political or personal, uh, vendetta or concern that we may have and that’s the way it worked."

The discussion occurred amid broader conversation criticizing President Donald Trump. Harris's appearance follows her 2024 election loss to Trump, where she secured 226 electoral votes to his 312. Recently, she has hinted at a potential 2028 presidential run. In an October interview, Harris stated, "I am not done. I have lived my entire career as a life of service and it’s in my bones." She told the BBC that she might become the first female president.

Criticism of the Biden administration's approach to the Epstein files has come from within Democratic circles. Former MSNBC host Joy Reid, speaking on 'The Breakfast Club' earlier this month, questioned former Attorney General Merrick Garland's inaction. "I don’t understand why he escapes the smoke. Even the Epstein files thing... Merrick Garland was there for four years. What were you doing?" Reid said. She added, "The Epstein files. Merrick, what were you doing? For four years? You had the same evidence, the same files. Why didn’t you release them? Merrick Garland did, to me, nothing for four years. He might as well not have been there."

This episode underscores persistent questions about transparency regarding the Epstein case under the previous administration.

Relaterede artikler

DOJ desk with partial Epstein files, redacted documents, and photo of Bill Clinton with Epstein, lawmakers frustrated in background.
Billede genereret af AI

DOJ releases partial Epstein files on deadline day

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

The U.S. Department of Justice partially released documents related to Jeffrey Epstein on December 19, 2025, meeting a congressional deadline but withholding hundreds of thousands more pages for later. The files include previously public materials and new photos of former President Bill Clinton with Epstein, amid heavy redactions to protect victims. Lawmakers from both parties expressed frustration over the incomplete disclosure.

Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, has criticized the Justice Department for missing a deadline to release unclassified files related to Jeffrey Epstein. In an NPR interview, he emphasized the need for transparency regarding withheld documents that could implicate powerful figures. Khanna and his Republican co-author are pushing Congress to intervene.

Rapporteret af AI

Following last week's partial release of Jeffrey Epstein files, the U.S. Justice Department announced a further delay Wednesday, after discovering more than a million additional potentially relevant records. The move comes after missing a congressionally mandated deadline, drawing bipartisan calls for transparency and an audit.

After a new federal transparency law set a Dec. 19, 2025, deadline for the Justice Department to publish unclassified Jeffrey Epstein-related records, the department released an initial tranche but has said reviewing and redacting the remaining material will take additional weeks. The pace, along with extensive redactions and the appearance of at least one fabricated document in the release, has fueled criticism from lawmakers in both parties and revived online conspiracy narratives heading into the 2026 midterm cycle.

Rapporteret af AI

Following the partial release of several hundred thousand pages on December 19, the U.S. Justice Department published an additional batch of over 13,000 files related to Jeffrey Epstein investigations, as required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The documents include investigative materials, grand jury transcripts, and other records but face criticism for heavy redactions and omissions. No major new revelations appeared, with hundreds of thousands more files slated for future release.

U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer has granted a Justice Department request to unseal grand jury transcripts and other investigative materials from the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking case, citing the newly enacted Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the public release of Epstein‑related documents by December 19, 2025. The ruling could make hundreds more records from the Epstein and Maxwell investigations available to the public, subject to redactions to protect victims’ identities.

Rapporteret af AI

The U.S. Department of Justice has unveiled its final batch of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, totaling around 3.5 million pages. These files, released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act of November 19, 2025, highlight connections between the convicted sex offender and prominent Silicon Valley figures. Billionaire Peter Thiel appears more than 2,200 times in the latest release.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis