Boardroom scene of Premier League clubs voting to approve 85% squad cost ratio and reject anchoring rules.
Boardroom scene of Premier League clubs voting to approve 85% squad cost ratio and reject anchoring rules.
Billede genereret af AI

Premier League clubs approve squad cost ratio and reject anchoring

Billede genereret af AI

Premier League clubs voted on Friday to introduce a new squad cost ratio system, limiting spending to 85% of football revenue, while rejecting controversial anchoring plans. The move closes loopholes previously used by clubs like Chelsea and Everton to sell assets such as hotels and women's teams. The rules will replace existing profitability and sustainability regulations from next season.

At a meeting on November 21, 2025, 14 of the Premier League's 20 clubs approved the squad cost ratio (SCR) system to replace the current profitability and sustainability rules (PSR). Under SCR, clubs must limit spending on squad costs—including transfer fees and player wages—to 85% of their football-related revenue and net profit or loss from player sales. Sales of capital assets, such as hotels or women's teams, will no longer count toward this allowance, closing a loophole exploited in recent years.

For instance, Chelsea sold two Stamford Bridge hotels to a sister company last year and their women's team to parent company Blueco for nearly £200 million, both moves boosting their PSR calculations. Everton followed suit in July 2025 by selling their women's team to Roundhouse Capital Holdings, controlled by owner Dan Friedkin's group. Aston Villa also sold their women's team to their parent company for £55 million earlier this year. These transactions were approved under existing rules but will be prohibited under SCR.

Clubs voted overwhelmingly against top-to-bottom anchoring (TBA), with 12 votes against, seven in favor, and one abstention. TBA would have capped squad spending at five times the central revenue of the league's bottom-placed side, drawing opposition from Manchester United, Manchester City, and Aston Villa. The Professional Footballers' Association threatened legal action against the measure, viewing it as a de facto salary cap.

A third proposal, sustainability and systematic resilience (SSR), was approved unanimously. SSR will monitor clubs' financial health through working capital, liquidity, and positive equity tests to address short-, medium-, and long-term risks. Breaches of SCR could result in fines for exceeding the 85% 'green threshold' or points deductions for surpassing the 115% 'red threshold,' with fines redistributed to compliant clubs.

The six clubs opposing SCR are Bournemouth, Brighton, Brentford, Crystal Palace, Fulham, and Leeds. The Premier League stated the new system was developed through consultations and aligns with UEFA's rules, promoting financial sustainability ahead of independent regulation.

Hvad folk siger

X discussions celebrate the rejection of anchoring as a win for bigger clubs' spending power, while approving the Squad Cost Ratio (SCR) at 85% of revenue for closing PSR loopholes and promoting sustainability; analysts note it favors high-revenue teams with annual monitoring and swift penalties, mixed sentiments from fans of smaller clubs hoping for competitive balance.

Relaterede artikler

Frustrated Premier League fans protesting VAR in a packed stadium, with referee reviewing a decision on the pitch.
Billede genereret af AI

Three-quarters of Premier League fans oppose VAR, survey shows

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

A survey by the Football Supporters' Association reveals that 75% of Premier League fans want video assistant referee technology scrapped. Nearly 8,000 supporters from all 20 top-flight clubs responded, with most citing reduced spontaneity in goal celebrations and prolonged decision times. The Premier League acknowledges fan concerns but maintains VAR improves accuracy.

The Premier League has fined Chelsea FC £10.75 million and imposed transfer restrictions following breaches of financial and youth development rules. The sanctions include a suspended one-year ban on first-team signings and an immediate nine-month ban on academy registrations. Chelsea self-reported the issues and cooperated fully with the investigation.

Rapporteret af AI

Real Madrid has claimed the top spot in Deloitte's Football Money League for the 2024-25 season with revenues of £975 million, ahead of Barcelona. For the first time in the report's 29-year history, no English club ranks in the top four, with Liverpool placing fifth. The rankings highlight the growing dominance of commercial income across Europe's elite clubs.

Liverpool suffered a 2-1 defeat to bottom-of-the-table Wolves in the Premier League, leaving them in sixth place after Chelsea's subsequent win over Aston Villa. Captain Virgil van Dijk admitted that failing to qualify for next season's Champions League would significantly impact the club's summer transfer plans. Financial experts estimate the absence could cost Liverpool up to £120 million in revenue.

Rapporteret af AI

As AFCON 2025 kicks off in Morocco—with 32 Premier League players absent, hitting Sunderland hardest (six losses) while sparing Arsenal—clubs face varying fixture difficulties and adaptation challenges. Previously covered absences now test teams like Manchester United amid packed schedules.

The Premier League has reaffirmed its dedication to the care and support of young players, particularly those released from academy contracts. In a letter, Neil Saunders of the Premier League responds to concerns about ongoing help for these footballers. The response highlights focus areas including mental health and overall health.

Rapporteret af AI

The Premier League's Key Match Incidents Panel has determined that Everton should have been awarded a penalty during their 1-0 loss to Arsenal on December 20, 2025. The incident involved Arsenal defender William Saliba kicking Everton striker Thierno Barry's boot inside the penalty area in the 57th minute. The panel voted 3-2 that referee Sam Barrott's on-field decision was wrong and that VAR official Michael Salisbury should have prompted a review.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis