Richter erklärt Streichung von Geisteswissenschaftsförderungen durch Trump-Regierung für verfassungswidrig

Ein Bundesrichter hat entschieden, dass die Streichung von mehr als 100 Millionen Dollar an Geisteswissenschaftsförderungen für Schriftsteller, Forscher und Akademiker durch die Trump-Regierung verfassungswidrig war. Das Urteil untersagt der Regierung die Einstellung der Zuschüsse und kritisiert den Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz bei diesem Verfahren.

Das Urteil ergeht inmitten mehrerer aktueller Klagen gegen die Kürzungen der Trump-Regierung bei Bundesbehörden und -programmen. In den vergangenen Monaten befassten sich Gerichte mit ähnlichen Fällen, die das Institute of Museum and Library Services betrafen; einer wurde außergerichtlich beigelegt, ein anderer entschied zugunsten der Generalstaatsanwälte der Bundesstaaten.

Verwandte Artikel

Federal judge in Boston courtroom grants injunction blocking Trump administration's race data order for universities, as state attorneys general celebrate.
Bild generiert von KI

Federal judge blocks Trump administration’s order requiring public universities in 17 states to submit race-related admissions data

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

A federal judge in Boston granted a preliminary injunction Friday blocking the Trump administration from enforcing a new requirement that public universities submit detailed admissions data to show they are not considering race, after a lawsuit brought by 17 Democratic state attorneys general.

The Trump administration has dropped its appeal in Rhode Island v. Trump, upholding a federal judge's order to halt the dismantling of the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Judge John J. McConnell issued a permanent injunction in November, requiring the restoration of grant funding after the agency lost more than half its staff. The decision preserves operations for the federal agency supporting public libraries and museums.

Von KI berichtet

In the latest development of the Anthropic supply chain risk controversy, a U.S. federal appeals court on April 9 denied Anthropic's emergency motion to block the Trump administration's blacklisting of its AI technology. The court expedited oral arguments for May 19 but ruled the balance of equities favors the government, marking a setback following a prior district court injunction.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on Friday ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Trump responded by announcing new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, later raising them to 15 percent. The European Union has paused a recent trade deal with the US amid the resulting uncertainty.

Von KI berichtet Fakten geprüft

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s proclamation describing migration at the U.S.-Mexico border as an “invasion” and using that finding to suspend access to asylum exceeds the authority Congress granted in immigration law. The decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could require the government to restart at-the-border asylum processing, though the administration has indicated it plans to seek further review.

The US Court of International Trade ruled on Thursday that the 10% temporary tariffs imposed by Donald Trump in February are illegal.

Von KI berichtet

The American Historical Association has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging a Justice Department opinion that deems the Presidential Records Act unconstitutional. The historians seek to prevent the destruction of White House documents. The case stems from a recent DOJ memo arguing the 1978 law violates separation of powers.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen