Arcom official challenges RSF study on CNews at press conference, with France 2 broadcast screen.
Arcom official challenges RSF study on CNews at press conference, with France 2 broadcast screen.
AI:n luoma kuva

Arcom challenges RSF study on CNews used by France 2

AI:n luoma kuva

France’s audiovisual regulator Arcom has challenged a study by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) on CNews’s pluralism, featured in France 2’s “Complément d’enquête.” Arcom states no rule violations occurred in March 2025. CNews hosts have dismissed the probe as biased.

On Wednesday, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) released a report on CNews, owned by Vincent Bolloré. The NGO analyzed 700,000 on-screen banners over a month and concluded the channel cheats on political balance rules to favor the far right, using “nighttime catch-ups” to create an illusion of pluralism.

Thursday evening, France 2’s “Complément d’enquête,” directed by Tristan Waleckx and spanning eight months, relied on this study to elaborate the accusations. A media figure described the setup as “stitched with white thread.”

Arcom challenged these findings. “There are no circumventions of political pluralism rules on CNews in March 2025, and if there had been, we would have identified and intervened,” the regulator stated before broadcast.

On Friday, November 28, CNews host Pascal Praud responded in “L’heure des pros.” He called the RSF study “manifestly bogus” with “biased judgment parameters,” mocking revelations like his fondness for Nicolas Sarkozy or no link between immigration and insecurity. Praud criticized the public broadcaster’s 4 billion euros annual cost, questioning privatization.

Mathieu Bock-Côté, CNews columnist since 2021 and Éric Zemmour’s successor, viewed the show as merely prosecuting the editorial line, without evidence of fraudulent information fabrication. He credits CNews’s success to covering realities denied elsewhere.

Mitä ihmiset sanovat

Reactions on X are polarized along political lines. Supporters of CNews hail Arcom's challenge to RSF's study as a decisive rebuttal, accusing RSF and France 2's Complément d’enquête of bias and disinformation funded by public money, while demanding privatization of public broadcasters. Critics dismiss Arcom's statement as protectionism for Bolloré-owned media, insisting CNews lacks pluralism and urging legal challenges. CNews figures like Pascal Praud labeled the investigation poorly conducted.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Dramatic illustration of outrage and delay over French public broadcasting report proposing cuts and mergers.
AI:n luoma kuva

Alloncle public broadcasting report ignites backlash after approval, publication delayed

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

Following the French Public Broadcasting Inquiry Commission's narrow approval last week, rapporteur Charles Alloncle's report—proposing mergers and €1 billion in cuts—has sparked outrage from France Télévisions and Radio France. Its official release, initially planned, is now delayed until Tuesday morning amid escalating tensions.

Charles Alloncle’s report on public broadcasting, published on May 5, 2026, on the National Assembly website, has sparked sharp controversy. France Télévisions’ president and the Prime Minister criticized it, while La France insoumise proposes reinstating the TV license fee. A complaint for illegal interest-taking targets the rapporteur.

Raportoinut AI

Journalists at France 3 Île-de-France have passed a 93% no-confidence motion against regional leadership and France Télévisions president Delphine Ernotte-Cunci. On strike since March 2, they oppose the reassignment of their studio to the group's Franceinfo channel. The action led to cancellations of election coverage evenings.

In the Somme department, once dotted with communist strongholds, PCF-affiliated mayors are now few and far between amid economic decline and the rise of the Rassemblement national. In Woincourt, Mayor Arnaud Petit laments the nighttime posting of an RN poster, a sign of mounting pressure on left-wing bastions. Aging militants and a lack of successors make political survival precarious ahead of the 2026 elections.

Raportoinut AI

Political scientist Emilien Houard-Vial deems the Républicains' (LR) ideological radicalization strategy a losing bet ahead of the 2026 municipal and 2027 presidential elections. In an interview with Le Monde, he examines the call for a « cordon sanitaire » around La France insoumise (LFI) made by Bruno Retailleau following the death of a nationalist militant. This approach, drawing on Rassemblement national (RN) themes, risks diluting the party's identity.

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää