More House leaders see no reason to impeach Marcos

More leaders in the House of Representatives have dismissed talk of impeaching President Marcos, stating there is no formal complaint or justification yet. Officials describe the discussions as mere rumors without substance for action. The majority in Congress continues to back the president firmly.

In Manila, Philippines, leaders from the House of Representatives have rejected discussions of impeaching President Marcos, emphasizing the absence of any formal complaint or valid grounds. At the Saturday News Forum in Quezon City, House committee on higher and technical education chairman Jude Acidre of Tingog Party-list stated, “Right now, there is no incident. There is no basis, to say the least, for the impeachment of the President.” He contrasted this with the previous vice presidential impeachment, which followed extensive investigations.

On Friday, Deputy Speaker Ronaldo Puno of Antipolo City, who chairs the National Unity Party, declared his party's opposition to any impeachment effort, citing a lack of constitutional or factual basis. Acidre added that it is unfair to speculate on rumors and that lawmakers would only address the issue upon receiving an official complaint, evaluating its merits then. He acknowledged that gathering the necessary votes would be challenging, given the strong support from the majority of House members for the president.

House committee on suffrage and electoral reform chairman Zia Alonto Adiong of Lanao del Sur, a key figure in the Lakas-Christian Muslim Democrats, agreed that the accusations do not yet constitute impeachable offenses. “Let me add because it is a rumor. This actually circulated not only among the mainstream media but even in social media,” Adiong noted. To his knowledge, no individual or group has stepped forward to file a complaint, rendering the talks vague and unsubstantiated.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Supreme Court building with VP Sara Duterte and lawyers celebrating impeachment dismissal ruling.
AI:n luoma kuva

Supreme Court upholds dismissal of VP Sara's first impeachment

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

Rumors are growing of potential impeachment proceedings against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. or Vice President Sara Duterte, but such complaints face significant hurdles due to legal constraints and political realities. Officials say there are no grounds for impeaching Marcos, and the Supreme Court's recent ruling has altered the process.

Raportoinut AI

The House of Representatives defended its decision not to accept impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. due to strict procedural rules. The complaints were turned away because Secretary General Cheloy Garafil was abroad. Lawmakers emphasized the formal nature of the process.

The House of Representatives is ready to receive and act on any impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte starting February 6, public accounts committee chair Terry Ridon said. This follows the Supreme Court's decision clarifying notice requirements for the express route of impeachment filing. The court's one-year bar rule against Duterte lapses on that date.

Raportoinut AI

In a shifting political landscape, President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. faces attempts to destabilize his administration, but structural changes make removal unlikely without constitutional processes. Economic stability and institutional reforms have neutralized traditional paths to ouster like military intervention or mass protests. Impeachment remains the only viable mechanism, though it faces significant hurdles in the current Congress.

In 2025, public anger over corruption boiled over into days of protests across various parts of the Philippines. At least one opposition faction called for the resignation of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and Vice President Sara Duterte. However, not all administration critics are willing to echo that demand.

Raportoinut AI

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced on December 9 that an anti-dynasty bill is among his priority measures for the 20th Congress, a move that raised eyebrows given his family's entrenched political dominance. Palace press officer Undersecretary Claire Castro explained that the president seeks to empower the public to choose leaders based on merit rather than surnames.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää