Repatriation of pension savings sparks debate in Colombia

President Gustavo Petro pushes for repatriating about 250 trillion pesos invested abroad by pension funds, criticizing the economic model since the 1990s. The proposal has reignited debates with figures like Enrique Peñalosa and raised technical warnings from experts like Mónica Higuera. Petro argues that workers' savings should create local jobs rather than benefiting foreign economies.

The debate over repatriating pension savings in Colombia has intensified following a draft decree from the Ministry of Hacienda. President Gustavo Petro replied in a December 30 tweet to opposition from former Bogotá mayor Enrique Peñalosa, stating: “many countries want workers' savings from abroad to come to their country to create jobs, but the foolish Colombian official prefers to create jobs abroad rather than in his territory”.

Petro endorsed withdrawing funds from Colfuturo, a private entity, and stressed that repatriated savings will remain in funds if workers choose, preventing their export as capital. He criticized the model introduced by Law 100 under César Gaviria, which he says deviated from the Social State of Law and fueled current inequality. He also faulted Juan Manuel Santos' decree for allowing overseas investments without workers' consent and at risk, an error Petro intends to repeal.

Mónica Higuera, former URF director, backs the president's equity vision but cautions against hasty changes. “There must be technical economic and legal simulations, actuarial ones. [...] Bringing $125 trillion in 6 months would be fatal,” she warned. Petro concluded that pension payouts should not rely on unstable market interest rates but on national productivity, advocating for a fairer system.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Dramatic illustration of Presidents Petro and Uribe in heated debate over Colombia's economic emergency decree, featuring decree documents, court symbols, and protests.
AI:n luoma kuva

Petro-Uribe Clash Intensifies Over Colombia's Economic Emergency Decree

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

Following the December 19 announcement of an economic emergency and business groups' petitions for suspension, President Gustavo Petro issued the decree on December 25. Álvaro Uribe's Centro Democrático filed a tutela claiming it unconstitutional, but the Constitutional Court delayed review until January 13 amid judicial vacancy, sparking a public feud.

Mónica Higuera Garzón, former director of the Financial Regulation Unit (URF), resigned due to her opposition to the government's proposal to repatriate pension savings invested abroad. Finance Minister Germán Ávila announced the measure on December 31, 2025, to raise funds and address the fiscal deficit. President Gustavo Petro defended the initiative, citing economic benefits, sparking a public debate with the ex-official.

Raportoinut AI

President Gustavo Petro insisted that the downfall of the economic emergency decree in the Constitutional Court will bankrupt the Colombian state, with about 4 trillion pesos missing from the budget. He criticized the previous government for handing billions of public funds to the country's richest without return. He also anticipated a fruitful meeting with Donald Trump in Washington.

Finance Minister Germán Ávila announced the declaration of an economic emergency following the failure of the tax reform, aiming to fund $16 trillion for the 2026 National General Budget. The draft decree includes taxes on assets, alcohol, cigarettes, and a special levy on hydrocarbons and coal. Business guilds such as Andi, ACM, and ACP question its constitutionality and effectiveness.

Raportoinut AI

In response to ongoing debates sparked by the recent registration of a promoter committee, President Gustavo Petro has reiterated he does not seek re-election—prohibited by Colombia's Constitution—and remains open to a civil society-driven Constituent Assembly to advance stalled social reforms.

The registration of a promoter committee for a national constituent assembly with the Registraduría has reignited a debate Colombia thought settled. Pushed by President Gustavo Petro's government, the initiative aims to alter institutional rules despite prior pledges to uphold the 1991 Constitution. Critics warn it could enable presidential re-election and undermine democracy.

Raportoinut AI

The debate on Colombia's Financing Law in Congress was suspended until Tuesday due to lack of quorum in the Fourth Commission of the House of Representatives. The bill aims to raise $16.3 trillion to fund a 2026 budget of $546.9 trillion, but faces opposition and potential cuts if not approved. President Gustavo Petro warned of a possible default, while experts like Anif dismiss that risk.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää