Syyte

Seuraa
Tense clash between South Korean justice ministry and prosecution officials over corruption case appeal linked to President Lee Jae-myung, with resignation offers and demands.
AI:n luoma kuva

Justice ministry and prosecution clash over pressure in Lee-linked corruption appeal

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

Controversy between South Korea's justice ministry and prosecution intensified on November 12 over alleged pressure to forgo appealing a corruption case linked to President Lee Jae-myung. The decision not to appeal the high-profile real estate scandal from Lee's time as Seongnam mayor has sparked internal pushback and suspicions of undue influence. The Seoul Central District chief prosecutor offered to resign, while the opposition demands the justice minister's resignation.

A female prosecutor in Japan has called for a third-party committee to investigate harassment among prosecution staff nationwide after alleging sexual assault by a senior colleague. She submitted a written request to the Justice Ministry on Monday and stated she would resign if the requested measures are not implemented by the end of March.

Raportoinut AI

Naista syytetään törkeästä eläinrääkkäyksestä, kun 41 koiraa takavarikoitiin Östergötlandin läänissä vuonna 2024. Koirat elivät surkeissa oloissa talossa, joka oli peittynyt ulosteisiin, ilman lämmitystä ja kilpailivat ruoasta. Nainen kiistää syytteet.

South Korea's capacity to investigate major crimes is weakening sharply ahead of the prosecutors' office dismantlement. With prosecutors dispatched to special counsel teams and others resigning, key divisions have seen staff halved, and regional offices lost about one-third of dedicated personnel. Despite the Democratic Party's reform bill passing, unresolved details are already causing investigative gaps.

Raportoinut AI

Santiago's Third Oral Criminal Court acquitted eight defendants in the SQM case by majority, including former senator Pablo Longueira and candidate Marco Enríquez-Ominami, criticizing the process's length and the prosecution's evidence quality. The verdict highlights a violation of the right to a timely trial after 11 years of investigation and a three-year trial. The sentence will be delivered in August 2026, leaving room for a nullity appeal.

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää