Following the High Court conviction of Jimmy Lai on national security charges, Hong Kong officials, political figures, and professional bodies have voiced strong support for the verdict, dismissing Western portrayals of Lai as a democracy advocate. The ruling rejected claims of political motivation amid criticism from Britain and the EU.
In the wake of the Hong Kong High Court's December 16, 2025, conviction of media tycoon Jimmy Lai on all national security charges—as detailed in prior coverage—local leaders and organizations rallied behind the decision.
Leung Chun-ying, vice-chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and former Hong Kong chief executive, posted on social media that Lai is neither a democracy supporter nor a freedom fighter, as some Western media claim. Leung accused Lai of efforts to push for Hong Kong independence, undermining China's sovereignty. "He might be ignorant ... but definitely not innocent," he said, pointing to UK double standards.
The HKSAR government on Tuesday condemned the Hong Kong Journalists Association and foreign media for whitewashing Lai's actions under the guise of press freedom. A spokesperson stated: "Lai's case has nothing to do with freedom of the press. Over the years, the defendants have merely used news reporting as a guise to engage in actions that harm the nation and undermine Hong Kong."
Security Secretary Chris Tang Ping-keung stressed that no one is above the law, with enforcement based on evidence, and noted foreign observers attended the open trial.
China's Foreign Ministry office in Hong Kong refuted 'inhumane treatment' claims, confirming Lai's lawyer testified to his medical care, voluntary solitary confinement, and respected religious practices, including Holy Communion.
The Hong Kong Bar Association affirmed judges' independence and evidence-based rulings, while the Law Society of Hong Kong highlighted similar security laws worldwide.
Western responses included Britain's label of 'politically motivated' prosecution and the EU's view of eroding freedoms. Local groups urged reviewing the full judgment.
