Allahabad high court rules lok adalats cannot grant divorces

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court has ruled that lok adalats and district legal services authorities lack the power to grant divorce decrees. The authority to dissolve marriages rests exclusively with family courts.

A division bench of justices Shekhar B Saraf and A.K. Chaudhary delivered the order on April 30. The ruling came in response to a petition filed by a woman who challenged a 2018 settlement recorded by the district legal services authority in Unnao.

The court stated that under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the National Legal Services Authority (Lok Adalat) Regulations, 2009, matrimonial disputes involving divorce cannot be referred to lok adalats for adjudication. Their role is limited to facilitating amicable settlements between parties.

The bench declared a clause in the Unnao settlement that allowed both parties to remarry as legally void. It clarified that no valid decree of divorce had been passed by a competent court and directed that copies of the judgment be circulated to all lok adalats and district legal services authorities in the state.

Labaran da ke da alaƙa

News illustration of UN concern regarding Taliban judicial decree on child marriage in Afghanistan.
Hoton da AI ya samar

UN raises alarm over Taliban decree on judicial separation that includes child-marriage provisions

An Ruwaito ta hanyar AI Hoton da AI ya samar An Binciki Gaskiya

The United Nations has voiced “grave concern” over a new decree issued by Afghanistan’s Taliban authorities governing judicial separation between spouses, warning that provisions in the text appear to allow child marriage and weaken requirements for free consent to marriage.

The Supreme Court has referred the Gyanvapi dispute to a Special Lok Adalat for talks between Hindu and Muslim parties. The move also brings other sensitive religious cases into the Samadhan Samaroh framework.

An Ruwaito ta hanyar AI

The Kerala High Court has disposed of a petition in a decades-old land dispute at Paryathukavu, allowing seven Dalit families to remain in their homes temporarily.

The Supreme Court has quashed a criminal case pending trial in Prayagraj since 1991, stressing that quick justice is essential under Article 21 of the Constitution.

An Ruwaito ta hanyar AI

The High Court has ruled that a marriage certificate is not the only factor considered when dividing property after a marriage ends. The decision recognises non-financial contributions such as caregiving and domestic work. It stems from a case involving two decades of family labour.

Wannan shafin yana amfani da cookies

Muna amfani da cookies don nazari don inganta shafin mu. Karanta manufar sirri mu don ƙarin bayani.
Ƙi