Philippines spared from US immigrant visa suspension

The United States will suspend immigrant visa processing for citizens of 75 countries starting January 21, but the Philippines is not affected. Philippine Ambassador Jose Manuel Romualdez confirmed that Filipinos are not included in this measure. The policy seeks to reassess screening procedures under the public charge provision of immigration law.

The US State Department announced a halt to immigrant visa applications from 75 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Russia, and Somalia, effective January 21. This builds on broader immigration and travel bans under President Trump's second term affecting nearly 40 countries. However, Philippine Ambassador to the United States Jose Manuel Romualdez told Philstar.com on January 15 that 'Filipinos [are] not included.'

The State Department's statement claimed that migrants from the targeted countries 'take welfare from the American people at unacceptable rates.' The suspension applies solely to immigrant visas for permanent residency, sparing tourist and business visas. It will remain in effect until the US can ensure that new immigrants will not 'extract wealth from the American people,' as stated in an X post.

The policy was first revealed through an internal memo obtained by Fox News and publicly confirmed on January 14. A separate directive to US embassies and consulates requires screening even non-immigrant visa applicants for potential use of public benefits.

The Philippines ranks among the top sources of immigrants to the US, with over 4 million Filipino Americans forming the third-largest Asian American community, mainly in California, Hawaii, and Texas. Although spared from this suspension, Filipinos have faced Trump's immigration measures before. In May of the previous year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided a group of Filipino teachers in Maui during a five-year exchange program to address Hawaii's teacher shortage, rousting them from their beds at gunpoint in search of a felon who was not present.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of a federal appeals court gavel blocking Trump's border 'invasion' proclamation, with asylum seekers at an opening U.S.-Mexico border gate.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Pengadilan banding blokir proklamasi 'invasi' perbatasan Trump, buka jalan untuk melanjutkan pemrosesan suaka

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

Pengadilan banding federal pada hari Jumat memutuskan bahwa proklamasi Presiden Donald Trump yang menggambarkan migrasi di perbatasan AS-Meksiko sebagai sebuah 'invasi' dan menggunakan temuan tersebut untuk menangguhkan akses terhadap suaka telah melampaui wewenang yang diberikan oleh Kongres dalam undang-undang imigrasi. Keputusan dari Pengadilan Banding AS untuk Sirkuit D.C. tersebut dapat mengharuskan pemerintah untuk memulai kembali pemrosesan suaka di perbatasan, meskipun pemerintahan Trump telah mengindikasikan rencana untuk menempuh peninjauan lebih lanjut.

Lima bulan setelah pemerintahan Trump menghentikan pemrosesan imigrasi dari negara-negara berisiko tinggi menyusul penembakan mematikan di D.C., kebijakan tersebut—yang kini mencakup 39 negara—telah membuat ribuan orang yang sudah berada di AS terjebak dalam ketidakpastian hukum, menghadapi kehilangan pekerjaan, karier yang terhambat, dan ketakutan akan deportasi. Kisah-kisah pribadi menyoroti kesulitan yang dialami, sementara gugatan hukum menghasilkan perintah pengadilan untuk mendapatkan keringanan.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The United States has announced targeted visa restrictions against individuals accused of undermining peace efforts in Ethiopia’s Tigray region.

Foreign Minister Roberto Velasco and governors Alfonso Durazo and Américo Villarreal rejected claims in a Los Angeles Times report about alleged US visa revocations.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Mahkamah Agung pada hari Selasa memutuskan bahwa pejabat perbatasan federal dapat mengklasifikasikan penduduk tetap yang sah yang menghadapi tuduhan pidana tertentu sebagai pemohon izin masuk saat kembali dari perjalanan luar negeri, bahkan tanpa adanya vonis. Keputusan 6-3 tersebut terbelah berdasarkan garis ideologis dan berpihak pada pemerintahan Trump dalam kasus Blanche v. Lau.

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak