Cory Doctorow proposes Nuremberg Caucus for Trump administration

Writer Cory Doctorow has suggested that congressional Democrats form a Nuremberg Caucus to document crimes by the Trump administration and prepare for future trials. The initiative would create a public platform for evidence collection, aiming to ensure accountability and deter further abuses. Doctorow argues this approach draws from historical examples of punishing authoritarian actions in other democracies.

In a recent blog post, Cory Doctorow, known for coining the term enshittification, outlined the concept of a Nuremberg Caucus as a response to what he describes as the Trump regime's crimes, including corruption, concentration camps, and executions of US civilians by federal forces. The proposed caucus would serve as a public-facing platform where Democrats could compile evidence such as statements, video clips, and outrages from Trump officials and their supporters. Each piece of evidence would receive an exhibit number and annotations detailing associated criminal and civil violations. The platform would also announce trial dates after January 20, 2029, and specify courtrooms for officials at all levels.

Doctorow emphasized the need for accountability in healthy democracies, citing recent examples: South Korea's life imprisonment sentence for former President Yoon Suk-yeol over his 2024 martial law attempt, and long prison terms for former presidents in Peru and Brazil for coup efforts. He criticized former Attorney General Merrick Garland's decision not to charge Trump promptly for attempting to overturn the 2020 election, suggesting it contributed to the current situation.

In a phone discussion, Doctorow stated, “We’re talking about people who violated their oath of office. They are categorically unfit to be in public service, and they need to be kept away from the levers of power.” He argued the caucus could politically benefit Democrats by focusing attention on specific crimes with evidence and witness lists, forcing Republicans into a defensive position.

Beyond politics, Doctorow highlighted deterrent effects, noting that perceived impunity encourages brazen actions, such as those attributed to officials like Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Secretary Kristi Noem. He suggested extensions like reviewing Trump-approved mergers, IRS audits of the wealthy, and $1 million bounties for ICE officers providing evidence of human rights violations by colleagues.

Doctorow's idea, detailed in an article by Aaron Regunberg, could inspire either congressional action or nongovernmental efforts modeled on groups like the Commission for International Justice and Accountability, which collects evidence for international human rights cases.

Articoli correlati

Illustration of Anne Applebaum on NPR discussing U.S. warning signs of authoritarian drift, with symbolic split imagery of democracy and emerging threats.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Anne Applebaum tells NPR the U.S. is still a democracy but shows warning signs of authoritarian drift

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

In an interview with NPR’s Scott Simon aired February 7, 2026, author and Atlantic staff writer Anne Applebaum said the United States is not currently an authoritarian state, but argued that the Trump-led MAGA movement is pursuing steps that could weaken the rule of law and push the country toward one-party rule. She compared the patterns she sees to democratic backsliding in countries including Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela.

Former Constitutional Court judge Ferdinand Kirchhof examines differences in the stability of democratic systems between the US and Germany. An article outlines a hypothetical scenario where a government turns Germany into an autocracy, persecutes 'illegal' people, and subjugates courts and media. Kirchhof explains where a Donald Trump-like figure would encounter limits and where the liberal order remains vulnerable.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

Colin McDonald, President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead a newly proposed Justice Department unit focused on fraud in federally funded programs, told senators he would pursue cases “without fear or favor” as Democrats questioned whether the initiative could blur lines between the White House and prosecutorial decision-making.

The House Oversight Committee has voted to recommend holding former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Republicans argue the Clintons obstructed the probe, while Democrats call it partisan politics. The matter now heads to the full House for approval.

Riportato dall'IA

U.S. Congress members returned to Washington this week after a two-week recess, facing a packed agenda including a high-profile Democrat's scandal, an ongoing war with Iran, expiring spy powers, and a prolonged Department of Homeland Security shutdown. Lawmakers must address calls to expel Representative Eric Swalwell, conduct show votes on the Iran conflict, renew FISA Section 702 authority, and resolve funding for the shuttered agency. These issues highlight tensions between parties and constitutional questions over executive actions.

Ghislaine Maxwell, serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme, invoked her Fifth Amendment rights during a virtual deposition before the House Oversight Committee on Monday. Her lawyer stated she would testify fully about Epstein's crimes only if President Donald Trump grants her clemency, adding that she could explain the innocence of both Trump and former President Bill Clinton. The committee expressed disappointment but aims to uncover more about Epstein's associates and victims.

Riportato dall'IA

In una tribuna su Le Monde, l'ex deputato ecologista Noël Mamère avverte delle somiglianze tra Francia e Stati Uniti in leggi e retorica politica. Da Parigi, gli eventi di Minneapolis riflettono i due volti dell'America: violenza storica e disobbedienza civile non violenta. Ciò evidenzia una scelta cruciale tra trumpismo e valori di giustizia.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta