Illustration of Anne Applebaum on NPR discussing U.S. warning signs of authoritarian drift, with symbolic split imagery of democracy and emerging threats.
Illustration of Anne Applebaum on NPR discussing U.S. warning signs of authoritarian drift, with symbolic split imagery of democracy and emerging threats.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Anne Applebaum tells NPR the U.S. is still a democracy but shows warning signs of authoritarian drift

Immagine generata dall'IA
Verificato

In an interview with NPR’s Scott Simon aired February 7, 2026, author and Atlantic staff writer Anne Applebaum said the United States is not currently an authoritarian state, but argued that the Trump-led MAGA movement is pursuing steps that could weaken the rule of law and push the country toward one-party rule. She compared the patterns she sees to democratic backsliding in countries including Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela.

NPR’s Scott Simon spoke with Anne Applebaum, a staff writer at The Atlantic and host of the podcast “Autocracy in America,” about what she described as mounting risks to U.S. democratic institutions.

Applebaum said the United States “is not an authoritarian state right now,” but argued that “a party in power” is attempting “to end or curb the rule of law” and move the country “in effect” toward “a one-party state.” She said the approach she sees in the United States resembles patterns observed in other democracies that later experienced authoritarian consolidation, citing Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela.

As examples, Applebaum pointed to efforts she characterized as the illegal removal of civil servants and their replacement with loyalists. She also said the Trump administration has asked Department of Justice and FBI officials to state who won the 2020 election as a way to assess promotability, describing it as a loyalty test in which officials are expected to say Trump won.

Applebaum said she sees similar warning signs in attempts to shape cultural and civic life, including what she described as efforts to exert control over universities, museums, the Kennedy Center and other cultural institutions.

She also raised concerns about immigration enforcement, describing the use of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a kind of “paramilitary” that appears personally loyal to the president rather than constrained by the rule of law. She said agents “wear masks,” that they “don’t have to obey the law about searching and entering,” and that people are arrested “based on their race” rather than on suspicion of committing a crime.

Applebaum cited corruption as another hallmark of authoritarian drift, alleging that people around Trump and members of his family have accepted money from foreign governments and others, seemingly in exchange for U.S. policy decisions.

On elections, Applebaum said the country is entering a critical period that she described as “the phase that we’re in this year,” pointing to debate about “nationalizing elections” and pressure on state and local election officials.

Asked whether these developments reflect “the government that Americans elected in 2024,” Applebaum said she did not believe all Trump voters intended to end democracy, though she said campaign rhetoric suggested to her a belief among Trump’s political circle that they had a right to power “and had no right to be challenged.” She also noted what she described as continuing constraints, including independent courts and a “slender majority in Congress” supporting the president.

Simon also asked about media freedom. Applebaum said there is still a free press, citing the fact that the interview itself was airing, but she argued that major outlets face growing pressure because owners can be vulnerable to government leverage tied to other business interests. She pointed to what she described as pressure by the owner of The Washington Post that “destroyed its reputation.”

Applebaum said she believes more Americans are beginning to grasp the stakes, describing concern she has heard on both coasts. She added that “the murders in Minnesota” helped wake more people up to what she called “the nature of this administration.”

Articoli correlati

Election officials strategize against potential federal interference in 2026 midterms, with polling station and agents visible outside.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Local election officials prepare for possible federal interference in 2026 midterms

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

State and local election administrators say they are preparing for potential disruptions tied to federal actions ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, after President Donald Trump’s administration moved early in his second term to tighten voting rules and reduce federal election-security staffing. Officials cite concerns ranging from litigation and requests for voter data to the possibility of armed deployments near polling places and immigration enforcement activity that could intimidate voters.

Former Constitutional Court judge Ferdinand Kirchhof examines differences in the stability of democratic systems between the US and Germany. An article outlines a hypothetical scenario where a government turns Germany into an autocracy, persecutes 'illegal' people, and subjugates courts and media. Kirchhof explains where a Donald Trump-like figure would encounter limits and where the liberal order remains vulnerable.

Riportato dall'IA

Affrontati da debito, crisi ambientale e insicurezza, molti francesi sentono che lo Stato non è più all'altezza delle sfide. Alcuni accetterebbero un leader autoritario per prevenire il collasso, anche a costo della democrazia. L'elezione di Donald Trump è stata uno shock per alcuni.

President Trump’s recent vetoes of two bipartisan measures — one tied to a water-pipeline project and another affecting tribal-related land issues in Florida’s Everglades — have sharpened questions about how he will work with Congress in 2026, according to an NPR interview with Cook Political Report editor Jessica Taylor.

Riportato dall'IA

In 2025, the US Supreme Court's conservative supermajority repeatedly supported President Donald Trump's expansive agenda, clearing paths for executive actions on immigration, the economy, and electoral power. This alignment, often without explanation via the shadow docket, raised questions about the court's role in democracy. Legal analysts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the implications in a year-end podcast, highlighting the focus on voting rights cases.

In 2025, widespread opposition challenged President Trump's policies through street protests, electoral victories, and court rulings. Approval ratings for Trump dropped sharply amid economic struggles and controversial deportations. Legal experts highlight over 150 federal court blocks on his executive actions, though the Supreme Court offered mixed support.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

On October 26, NPR’s Ayesha Rascoe and Mara Liasson discussed President Trump’s Asia trip, the demolition of the White House’s East Wing to make way for a new ballroom, fresh U.S. sanctions on major Russian oil companies, intensifying redistricting fights, and a federal shutdown that has stretched nearly four weeks.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta