A dramatic courtroom scene from the Constitutional Court hearing on President Ramaphosa's impeachment over Phala Phala.
A dramatic courtroom scene from the Constitutional Court hearing on President Ramaphosa's impeachment over Phala Phala.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Constitutional court orders impeachment committee for Ramaphosa over Phala Phala

AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

South Africa's Constitutional Court has ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally by blocking an impeachment inquiry into President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2022. The decision requires the National Assembly to establish an impeachment committee to examine the Phala Phala matter. Opposition parties immediately called for the president's resignation.

The majority judgment, delivered on 9 May 2026, set aside the National Assembly's December 2022 vote that declined to refer an independent panel report to an impeachment committee. Chief Justice Mandisa Maya stated that accountability is a foundational constitutional value and that the National Assembly must ensure the president is held accountable.

The ruling stems from allegations involving the theft of foreign currency from Ramaphosa's Phala Phala game farm in 2020. The court found that the Assembly had erred in halting further proceedings despite the panel's findings.

Opposition leaders reacted swiftly. Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema said Ramaphosa should resign to focus on the process. African Transformation Movement leader Vuyo Zungula and ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba echoed calls for him to step down immediately.

The African National Congress is scheduled to discuss the judgment at its National Working Committee meeting on 11 May. The MK Party has filed a motion of no confidence, while the South African Communist Party urged that impeachment proceedings begin without delay.

사람들이 말하는 것

Initial reactions on X show opposition figures and unions welcoming the court ruling as vindication for accountability on Phala Phala. Users from diverse accounts, including analysts and media, note pressure on Ramaphosa to resign or face inquiry, with some explaining the legal implications and others questioning ANC responses.

관련 기사

Illustration of the Constitutional Court ordering an impeachment inquiry into President Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala scandal.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Constitutional court orders impeachment inquiry into ramaphosa

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

South Africa's Constitutional Court ruled today that parliament must establish an impeachment committee to examine allegations against President Cyril Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala farm theft.

The Democratic Alliance says it will participate in any impeachment process following the Constitutional Court ruling that found the National Assembly acted inconsistently with the Constitution in the Phala Phala matter.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Former South African presidents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma have filed a court challenge to remove retired judge Sisi Khampepe from heading an inquiry into delays in Truth and Reconciliation Commission prosecutions. The move targets alleged political interference in apartheid-era cases and raises questions about judicial impartiality. President Cyril Ramaphosa has stated he will abide by the court's decision.

The Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality faces suspension of its equitable share grant unless it meets National Treasury compliance demands by 30 April. Acting chief operations officer Lulamile Moolman confirmed the Treasury has started invoking Section 216(2) of the Constitution. Councillors clashed at a recent Municipal Public Accounts Committee meeting over document processing.

AI에 의해 보고됨

판필로 락손 상원 부의장은 상원이 이달 중 탄핵 심판 법정으로 소집되어 6월부터 사라 두테르테 부통령에 대한 본격적인 재판에 착수할 수 있다고 밝혔다. 이러한 일정은 하원이 탄핵 소추안을 승인하는지에 달려 있다. 두테르테 부통령은 기밀비 유용 및 기타 혐의를 받고 있다.

Limpopo Premier Dr Phophi Ramathuba has urged accelerated service delivery during Freedom Day celebrations in Malamulele. Residents there voiced ongoing concerns over water shortages, poor roads, and lack of housing and clinics. Ramathuba pledged visible changes and praised President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership.

AI에 의해 보고됨

더불어민주당 주도의 국회가 헌법재판소법 개정안을 통과시켜 헌법재판소가 대법원 확정 판결을 포함한 하급심 판결을 심사할 수 있게 됐다. 국민의힘의 필리버스터가 종료된 후 162대 63으로 통과됐다. 이 법안은 사법 개혁의 일환으로, 여당은 국민 권리 보호를 주장하나 야당은 사법부 독립 훼손이라고 비판한다.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부