A dramatic courtroom scene from the Constitutional Court hearing on President Ramaphosa's impeachment over Phala Phala.
A dramatic courtroom scene from the Constitutional Court hearing on President Ramaphosa's impeachment over Phala Phala.
Image generated by AI

Constitutional court orders impeachment committee for Ramaphosa over Phala Phala

Image generated by AI

South Africa's Constitutional Court has ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally by blocking an impeachment inquiry into President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2022. The decision requires the National Assembly to establish an impeachment committee to examine the Phala Phala matter. Opposition parties immediately called for the president's resignation.

The majority judgment, delivered on 9 May 2026, set aside the National Assembly's December 2022 vote that declined to refer an independent panel report to an impeachment committee. Chief Justice Mandisa Maya stated that accountability is a foundational constitutional value and that the National Assembly must ensure the president is held accountable.

The ruling stems from allegations involving the theft of foreign currency from Ramaphosa's Phala Phala game farm in 2020. The court found that the Assembly had erred in halting further proceedings despite the panel's findings.

Opposition leaders reacted swiftly. Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema said Ramaphosa should resign to focus on the process. African Transformation Movement leader Vuyo Zungula and ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba echoed calls for him to step down immediately.

The African National Congress is scheduled to discuss the judgment at its National Working Committee meeting on 11 May. The MK Party has filed a motion of no confidence, while the South African Communist Party urged that impeachment proceedings begin without delay.

What people are saying

Initial reactions on X show opposition figures and unions welcoming the court ruling as vindication for accountability on Phala Phala. Users from diverse accounts, including analysts and media, note pressure on Ramaphosa to resign or face inquiry, with some explaining the legal implications and others questioning ANC responses.

Related Articles

Illustration of the Constitutional Court ordering an impeachment inquiry into President Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala scandal.
Image generated by AI

Constitutional court orders impeachment inquiry into ramaphosa

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

South Africa's Constitutional Court ruled today that parliament must establish an impeachment committee to examine allegations against President Cyril Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala farm theft.

Parliament announced the 31 MPs who will serve on the Impeachment Committee probing President Cyril Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala matter. The panel was established following a Constitutional Court order earlier in May.

Reported by AI

South Africa's National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza has begun the process of forming a 31-member impeachment committee to examine allegations against President Cyril Ramaphosa over foreign currency found at his Phala Phala farm. The move follows a Constitutional Court ruling last Friday that declared a parliamentary rule unconstitutional and required the committee's establishment. Political parties must submit names for the committee by 22 May 2026.

South African police officials told Parliament on 10 June 2026 that insufficient evidence prevented misconduct findings in the 2020 Phala Phala farm theft case.

Reported by AI

The United Africans Transformation party has raised concerns about the appointment of Makashule Gana as chairperson of the parliamentary impeachment committee investigating President Cyril Ramaphosa.

A parliamentary ad hoc committee has concluded that witness testimony reveals a serious institutional crisis in South Africa’s law enforcement agencies. The findings follow months of hearings into allegations of drug cartel infiltration.

Reported by AI

The African National Congress in the Eastern Cape has paused its 10th provincial elective conference following a high court interdict. Three party members successfully sought the court order over verification irregularities and guideline violations. The ANC now awaits judicial advice on rescheduling.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline