Running Tide's carbon removal project ends in ocean wood dumping

Running Tide, a company backed by Microsoft, Stripe, and Shopify, promised innovative carbon removal but ultimately dumped thousands of tons of wood chips into the sea. The venture, which positioned itself at the forefront of environmental technology, appears to have failed without much notice. This development highlights challenges in the emerging field of carbon capture.

Running Tide emerged as a promising player in carbon removal, securing support from major corporations including Microsoft, Stripe, and Shopify. The company aimed to lead advancements in mitigating carbon emissions through ocean-based methods. However, its efforts concluded dramatically by releasing thousands of tons of wood chips directly into the sea, a move that drew scrutiny over its effectiveness and environmental impact.

The project's trajectory underscores the uncertainties in scaling novel carbon removal technologies. While initial backing suggested potential for breakthroughs in addressing climate change, the outcome revealed practical and perhaps ethical hurdles. Operations seemed tied to oceanic environments, with connections to Iceland noted in related discussions.

This case serves as a cautionary tale for investors and innovators in the sustainability sector, where high expectations often clash with real-world implementation. The story, supported by the Pulitzer Center, emphasizes the need for rigorous validation in environmental initiatives.

관련 기사

Harald Mix at a press conference stepping down as Stegra chairman, with the Boden steel plant in the background, amid financial challenges.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Harald Mix steps down as Stegra chairman

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Steel company Stegra, building a fossil-free steel plant in Boden, announced on October 20, 2025, that founder Harald Mix is stepping down as board chairman. Mix remains a board member while Shaun Kingsbury takes over the role. The news comes amid a financial crisis where the company needs 10 billion kronor in new capital.

Researchers propose felling coniferous trees from boreal forests prone to wildfires and sinking them via Arctic rivers to sequester up to 1 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide annually. This method aims to store carbon long-term in ocean depths, drawing on evidence of preserved wood in cold environments. However, experts warn of potential ecological risks, including biodiversity loss and permafrost thaw.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Hannes Junginger-Gestrich, CEO of Carbonfuture, discusses the company's role in building monitoring, reporting, and verification systems for carbon removal in a recent podcast. Launched five years ago, Carbonfuture facilitates durable carbon removal through a digital platform that connects various methods with buyers. The firm emphasizes scientific rigor and ecosystem collaboration to scale efforts toward gigatons of removals by 2040.

One year into his second term, President Donald Trump aggressively dismantled environmental protections and boosted fossil fuels, slowing U.S. clean energy momentum. However, many actions rely on reversible executive orders amid legal pushback and market-driven renewable growth, limiting their long-term effects.

AI에 의해 보고됨

In 2025, President Donald Trump has aggressively promoted deep-sea mining for critical minerals in the Pacific Ocean, boosting companies like The Metals Company despite environmental and Indigenous concerns. This move disregards international regulations and local advocacy, targeting vast areas rich in cobalt and nickel. Scientists warn of lasting ecological damage, while Indigenous groups fight to protect cultural ties to the ocean.

In a recent episode of the 'Sustainability In Your Ear' podcast, Elizabeth Blankenship-Singh from Overlay Capital discusses reimagining waste as feedstock for new products and packaging. The episode highlights innovative approaches to cycling materials back into use. Published on January 12, 2026, it offers insights into sustainable practices.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The Trump administration has paused leases for five major offshore wind projects along the East Coast, citing national security concerns related to radar interference. The move, announced on Monday, affects developments off Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Virginia, and New York. Critics argue it unlawfully hinders clean energy progress amid growing electricity demands.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부