Dramatic illustration of CPB executives voting to dissolve amid congressional funding cuts.
Bilde generert av AI

Corporation for Public Broadcasting votes to dissolve after Congress rescinds federal funding

Bilde generert av AI
Faktasjekket

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting has voted to dissolve after Congress approved a rescissions law eliminating about $1.1 billion in CPB funding for future fiscal years, a move that accelerates a wind-down already underway as public media groups face renewed political pressure from President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans.

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) said its board voted on Monday, January 5, 2026, to dissolve the nonprofit created by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, bringing to a close an organization that has long administered federal support for public media stations and national programming.

The decision follows congressional passage of a rescissions measure in July 2025 that eliminated roughly $1.1 billion in CPB funding that had been set aside for upcoming budget years. CPB leadership has said the loss of the federal appropriation left the organization unable to operate as envisioned by the 1967 law.

CPB had already begun an orderly wind-down. In an earlier statement about its operations after the funding loss, the organization said most staff positions would end at the close of the federal fiscal year on September 30, 2025, with a smaller transition team continuing into January 2026 to complete the shutdown.

The funding fight has unfolded amid long-running conservative criticism of public media, including allegations of ideological bias at NPR and PBS. President Trump urged Republicans in Congress to “DEFUND” public broadcasting in a mid-July post on his Truth Social account, calling it “worse than CNN & MSDNC put together.”

Some of the sharpest scrutiny has focused on editorial decisions at NPR and PBS. Conservative media watchdog Media Research Center has published a study of PBS’s “Washington Week with The Atlantic,” alleging overwhelmingly negative treatment of Republicans and the Trump administration over a three-month period. Separately, House Republicans questioned NPR chief executive Katherine Maher during a July hearing about claims of bias, including how NPR handled reporting related to the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 campaign.

Uri Berliner, a former NPR editor who resigned after publicly criticizing the network’s editorial direction, told The New York Times in a text message that NPR should acknowledge what he described as a progressive orientation and decline federal support.

Public media advocates have warned that removing CPB’s federal funding threatens smaller local stations, particularly in rural and underserved areas, that rely on CPB support to provide news, educational programming and emergency information.

Hva folk sier

Discussions on X highlight polarized reactions to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's dissolution after federal funding cuts. Conservatives celebrated it as ending taxpayer support for biased 'left-wing propaganda,' crediting Trump and Congress. Critics lamented the loss of 58 years of educational programming and called it censorship or fascist. Neutral posts from journalists and outlets factually reported the board's vote for an orderly wind-down, noting impacts on NPR, PBS, and local stations.

Relaterte artikler

Illustration depicting CFPB headquarters amid Trump administration's funding freeze and staff cuts, with employees leaving and protesters outside.
Bilde generert av AI

CFPB faces upheaval as Trump administration seeks funding freeze and sweeping staff cuts

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI Faktasjekket

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has faced a year of disruption as the Trump administration moved to halt funding and lay off most of the agency’s workforce, triggering court fights that have temporarily kept some functions running while much of its supervision and enforcement remains stalled.

Attacks on French public broadcasting have intensified with the launch of a parliamentary inquiry commission in autumn 2025. Initiated by the Union des droites pour la République (UDR), allied with the Rassemblement national (RN), the probe examines the neutrality, operations, and funding of the public service. Recurrent criticisms include alleged ideological bias and excessive costs.

Rapportert av AI Faktasjekket

By year’s end, the civilian federal workforce is projected to fall from about 2.4 million to roughly 2.1 million employees, according to Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor. The cuts—championed by budget chief Russell Vought and the White House initiative dubbed the Department of Government Efficiency, which Elon Musk led for the first four months—have targeted agencies overseeing health, the environment, education, and financial regulation while expanding immigration enforcement.

In 2025, President Donald Trump’s return to the White House coincided with a sweeping departure from the federal workforce, with about 317,000 employees leaving through firings, resignations and retirements by year’s end, according to the Office of Personnel Management. A crackdown on diversity initiatives, new performance pressures and uncertainty over job security left morale deeply shaken, as personal stories illustrate the human toll.

Rapportert av AI

The Trump administration announced substantial layoffs of federal employees on October 10, 2025, as the government shutdown entered its tenth day. Court filings indicate around 4,200 workers across seven agencies are receiving reduction-in-force notices. The move has heightened tensions in Congress, with both parties blaming each other for the impasse over funding and health care subsidies.

With enrollment deadlines approaching for new health insurance plans, Republicans remain divided over how to handle expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies, even as President Trump continues to promise a better replacement plan.

Rapportert av AI

One year after the federal American Climate Corps was dismantled ahead of Donald Trump's return to the White House, several states have sustained similar environmental service programs through local funding. California and Washington stand out for their ongoing efforts to build green workforces despite national cuts. These initiatives highlight politically viable paths forward for climate-related jobs.

 

 

 

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis