Activists in an Oregon park collect signatures for a ballot initiative to protect marriage equality, abortion rights, and gender-affirming care under a banner reading 'Equal Rights for All'.
Bilde generert av AI

Oregon campaign seeks constitutional protections for marriage equality, abortion rights and gender-affirming care

Bilde generert av AI
Faktasjekket

A coalition in Oregon is advancing a 2026 ballot initiative to amend the state constitution and explicitly protect marriage equality, reproductive access and gender-affirming care. The Equal Rights for All campaign says it needs roughly 156,000 valid signatures by summer 2026 to qualify; organizers are aiming well above that threshold and report early volunteer momentum, according to The Nation.

In 2014—one year before the U.S. Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. Hodges ruling—U.S. District Judge Michael McShane struck down Oregon’s ban on same-sex marriage in Geiger v. Kitzhaber. Counties began issuing marriage licenses immediately, and Oregon United for Marriage dropped its planned ballot push. “We are confident that the freedom to marry is secure in Oregon and that we do not need to move forward with the ballot measure,” the group said at the time. (reuters.com)

Despite that ruling, Oregon’s constitution still contains Article XV, section 5a: “It is the policy of Oregon, and its political subdivisions, that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally recognized as a marriage.” (oregonlegislature.gov)

The Equal Rights for All campaign—backed by Basic Rights Oregon, the ACLU of Oregon and Planned Parenthood Advocates of Oregon—seeks to amend the constitution’s equality language to make clear that protections include pregnancy and related health decisions, gender identity and related health care, sexual orientation (including the right to marry), and sex. The measure would also repeal Article XV, section 5a. The proposal is filed with the state as Initiative Petition 33 (IP 33). (aclu-or.org)

To qualify a constitutional amendment for the ballot, campaigns must submit valid signatures equal to 8% of votes cast for governor at the last election—about 156,000 under current thresholds—with petitions due four months before the general election. Organizers say they are aiming for more than 200,000 signatures to ensure a buffer. (sos.oregon.gov)

The Elections Division received IP 33 on June 24, 2024; a certified ballot title followed that September as the campaign moved into public signature gathering. (content.govdelivery.com)

So far, volunteers have collected about 40,000 signatures at events across the state—from Portland Pride to small-town fairs—according to The Nation’s reporting, which quotes campaign organizers describing a volunteer-led start. Campaign event listings show ongoing petition drives and trainings. (thenation.com)

Advocates frame the measure as insurance should federal protections change. “Now we’re seeing there’s more work to be done,” said Gaby Gardiner of Basic Rights Oregon. “The fight isn’t over. We still have marriage defined as a man and our women in [the state] Constitution.” And while “it’s not entirely clear what would happen with marriage equality in Oregon if [Obergefell] were overturned,” communications manager Blair Stenvick said, “our amendment would provide clarity.” (Both statements were reported by The Nation.) (thenation.com)

An earlier attempt to refer a similar amendment from the Legislature—SJR 33, introduced in April 2023 by then–Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber—advanced out of the Senate Rules Committee but stalled as the session ground to a halt during a six‑week Republican walkout over bills involving abortion, transgender health care and guns. (opb.org)

Equal Rights for All organizers say their effort is broader than marriage alone, emphasizing protections that reflect the needs of immigrants, transgender Oregonians and people with disabilities. A 16‑year‑old volunteer described gathering signatures at her local farmers market as “true, tangible change,” The Nation reported. (thenation.com)

Relaterte artikler

Protesters at a rally debating transgender policies amid 2026 election campaigns in Nevada and Maine.
Bilde generert av AI

Transgender policies emerge as flashpoint for 2026 races, from Nevada governor’s contest to a Maine ballot push

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI Faktasjekket

After Democrats notched 2025 wins in Virginia and New Jersey, some strategists argue transgender-rights attacks fell flat — but both parties are preparing to fight over the issue again in 2026.

The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled 4-1 on January 6, 2026, that two 2023 laws banning most abortions—including a first-in-the-nation explicit ban on abortion pills—violate a 2012 state constitutional amendment guaranteeing competent adults the right to make their own health care decisions.

Rapportert av AI Faktasjekket

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, November 10, 2025, declined without comment to hear former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis’s petition seeking to revisit Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 ruling that legalized same‑sex marriage nationwide. Davis had asked the justices to relieve her of more than $360,000 in combined damages and legal fees stemming from her refusal to issue marriage licenses to a same‑sex couple and to revisit Obergefell; the Court denied review and issued no noted dissents.

A bipartisan majority in the House has secured the 218 signatures needed on a discharge petition to compel a vote on legislation that would nullify a March 27 executive order by President Trump that curtailed collective bargaining at numerous federal agencies.

Rapportert av AI Faktasjekket

In an unsigned emergency order on Nov. 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to enforce a rule requiring U.S. passports to list sex as assigned at birth, pausing a lower-court injunction. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.

Female athletes and Republican attorneys general held a press conference on Monday to urge the Supreme Court to uphold state laws barring transgender women from women's sports. The cases, West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, could affect regulations in 27 states protecting women's privacy and fairness in competitions. Oral arguments are set for Tuesday morning.

Rapportert av AI Faktasjekket

A Democrat-sponsored bill to allow terminally ill adults in Illinois to obtain life-ending medication has cleared the General Assembly and awaits Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s review following a 30–27 Senate vote in the early hours of Oct. 31, after House passage in May.

 

 

 

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis