Calcutta High Court orders centre to regularise 7,520 Andaman workers after 38-year battle

The Calcutta High Court has ordered the central government to approve a regularisation scheme for 7,520 Daily Rated Mazdoors (DRMs) in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The court stated that the government cannot maintain double standards. This follows a 38-year legal battle.

A division bench of the Calcutta High Court, comprising Justices Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Smita Das De, issued the order on April 28. It came on a plea by the Union of India challenging a single judge's February decision that directed the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) to approve the Andaman and Nicobar Casual Labourers/Daily Rated Mazdoors (Engagement and Regularisation) Scheme 2023.

The court stated, “The standards governing the union government have to be judged on a much higher pedestal than those of ordinary citizens. The state cannot maintain double standards, on the one hand, facilitating compliance... by disbursing... Rs 300 crore... while denying to comply with the rest of the judgment on the ground of ‘policy decision’.”

The litigation began with a 1988 office memorandum on pay and regularisation of casual workers. A 2022 division bench order directed the Andaman and Nicobar administration to frame a regularisation scheme, notified in August 2023 following the “threat of contempt proceedings” in the Supreme Court.

Additional Solicitor General S D Sanjay, for the Union, argued the scheme violates Supreme Court principles in Secretary, State of Karnataka v Umadevi, as it regularises 7,520 DRMs en masse without checking sanctioned posts. The court rejected this, holding that court decisions bind the state equally and judicial precedents evolve with time.

Makala yanayohusiana

Supreme Court of India scene with disappointed West Bengal election staff and vibrant polling booth crowds highlighting high turnout.
Picha iliyoundwa na AI

Supreme Court directs 65 Bengal poll duty staff to approach tribunals

Imeripotiwa na AI Picha iliyoundwa na AI

India's Supreme Court directed petitioners, including 65 on election duty in West Bengal whose names were deleted from the voter list after Special Intensive Revision (SIR), to approach appellate tribunals. The court refused their plea for immediate voting rights. It also praised the record 92.88% turnout and peaceful polling in the first phase.

The Supreme Court on June 23, 2026, told petitioners to first approach the Calcutta High Court over a West Bengal order that links Special Intensive Revision outcomes to access to subsidised ration and nutrition schemes.

Imeripotiwa na AI

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

The Union government on Monday notified the appointment of four high court chief justices and senior advocate V Mohana as Supreme Court judges.

Imeripotiwa na AI

India's Supreme Court will hear on Saturday a Trinamool Congress (TMC) plea challenging the Election Commission's directive for deploying central government or PSU staff as counting supervisors in West Bengal's assembly polls. The party contests the order mandating at least one such employee per counting table ahead of the May 4 vote count. The Calcutta High Court had earlier dismissed TMC's petition.

Himachal Pradesh's Revenue Department is reviewing over 300 cases of violations under Section 118 of the Tenancy and Land Reforms Act—which restricts agricultural land sales to non-agriculturists without government approval—from January 2023 to January 2026. This includes the ongoing Chester Hills housing project controversy in Solan. Revenue Minister Jagat Singh Negi has directed districts for status reports, with official data showing 849 of 2,354 applications still pending.

Imeripotiwa na AI

The Delhi High Court has ruled that aspirants from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) cannot seek parity with SC/ST/OBC candidates for relaxations in upper age limits or number of attempts in Central government appointments. Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan noted that the handicaps faced by socially backward and economically deprived classes differ.

 

 

 

Tovuti hii inatumia vidakuzi

Tunatumia vidakuzi kwa uchambuzi ili kuboresha tovuti yetu. Soma sera ya faragha yetu kwa maelezo zaidi.
Kataa