Bill to replace UGC and AICTE lacks grant powers for regulator

The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, aims to establish a unified higher education regulator by subsuming the functions of UGC, AICTE, and NCTE. It strips the new regulatory council of authority to disburse grants or regulate fees, focusing instead on standards and penalties. The legislation aligns with the National Education Policy 2020 to streamline oversight in the sector.

The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, is poised for introduction in the current parliamentary session. This proposed law seeks to create an overarching commission, the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan, which will oversee three specialized councils: the Regulatory Council, Standards Council, and Accreditation Council. These bodies will handle regulation, standard-setting, and accreditation for higher education institutions, effectively replacing the University Grants Commission (UGC) Act of 1956, the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) Act of 1987, and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) Act of 1993.

Notably, the Regulatory Council will not possess powers to allocate grants to institutions or control fees, diverging from the previous frameworks. The UGC previously disbursed funds to central universities and could influence fee structures through regulations, while AICTE managed grants for technical institutions. Under the new bill, funding for centrally funded higher educational institutes falls outside the councils' purview and will be managed separately by the Ministry of Education, as per the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020's vision to separate funding from regulatory functions.

The bill empowers the Regulatory Council to enforce compliance through penalties, starting from a minimum of Rs 10 lakh up to Rs 2 crore for violations, with the steepest fines for unauthorized establishment of institutions. It promotes a policy against commercialization in higher education and mandates public disclosure of institutional details online.

The commission will be led by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, supported by up to 12 members including council presidents and experts. Each council will have a president with at least 10 years of professorial experience and up to 14 members, incorporating state representatives on rotation.

In cases of policy disputes, the central government's decision prevails, and it can supersede the bodies for up to six months with presidential approval. The legislation excludes medical, legal, and similar professional programs but integrates architecture education oversight. Its objectives highlight reducing over-regulation through a technology-driven, single-window system based on self-disclosure, fostering a 'light but tight' framework as outlined in NEP 2020.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

Dharmendra Pradhan reviewing NEET-UG 2026 re-exam preparations with officials in a formal meeting.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Dharmendra Pradhan reviews NEET-UG 2026 re-exam preparations

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan reviewed preparations for the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination scheduled for June 21, directing officials to ensure strict security protocols after the paper leak incident.

Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan chaired a high-level review of NIT Kurukshetra on Tuesday, urging urgent steps to enhance campus life and student engagement. Following recent student suicides, he emphasised campus vibrancy, mentoring systems and innovation. Broader reforms were outlined for all higher educational institutions.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The Union Education Ministry issued letters of approval on June 9 to the University of Bristol, the University of York and the University of New South Wales for new campuses in India.

The Commission on Higher Education has postponed the pilot testing of its proposed reframed general education curriculum from 2026 to 2028. The decision follows petitions from teachers, students, and advocacy groups opposing the reduction of GE units from 36 to 18. Officials cited the need for further review of stakeholder comments.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ