Realistic courtroom illustration of ICC judges confirming crimes against humanity charges against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.
Realistic courtroom illustration of ICC judges confirming crimes against humanity charges against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.
AI 生成的图像

国际刑事法院确认对杜特尔特提出指控,案件进入审判阶段

AI 生成的图像

国际刑事法院预审分庭于4月23日星期四确认了针对菲律宾前总统罗德里戈·杜特尔特的三项危害人类罪指控。该案现将进入全面审判阶段,涉及与其禁毒战争及达沃行刑队相关的谋杀指控。杜特尔特目前仍被关押在位于荷兰斯海弗宁恩的国际刑事法院拘留中心。

4月23日星期四,国际刑事法院的全女性预审分庭裁定,有充分理由相信罗德里戈·杜特尔特对其禁毒战争及达沃行刑队(DDS)相关的谋杀案负有刑事责任。这三项罪名包括两项与禁毒战争有关的指控——一项针对高价值目标,另一项针对“托克昂行动”(Oplan Tokhang)——以及一项针对达沃行刑队的指控。裁决指出,内部证人表明菲律宾国家警察所谓的“nanlaban”(拒捕反抗)叙事纯属捏造,实际上是向受害者栽赃毒品、钱财和枪支。

国际刑事法院表示,直接肇事者遵循了一种通过伪造证据来模拟正当防卫的作案手法。法官审查了来自11名内部证人、7名犯罪相关证人、1名专家证人以及其他7人的证词。一名证人称,在杜特尔特担任达沃市市长期间,达沃行刑队成员是达沃市政府的“幽灵员工”,这一说法得到了2013年一份市政府文件的佐证。

国际法教授埃维卡尔·克鲁兹-费雷尔(Evecar Cruz-Ferrer)表示,根据《罗马规约》第63条,杜特尔特必须亲自出庭受审。他目前仍被关押在符合国际人权标准的国际刑事法院拘留中心。他保留聘请法律顾问、提交证据、保持沉默以及在排除合理怀疑被证明有罪之前享有无罪推定的权利。

前“国家人民阵线”(Bayan Muna)众议员内里·科尔梅纳雷斯(Neri Colmenares)称赞这一裁决是受害者和国际问责制的胜利。他说:“如果杜特尔特挑战成功,那将成为独裁者的效仿范例。”“卡拉帕坦”(Karapatan)秘书长克里斯蒂娜·帕拉巴伊(Cristina Palabay)称这为审判的进行开了“绿灯”。

人们在说什么

社交平台X上对于国际刑事法院确认杜特尔特指控的反应呈现两极分化:许多人将其视为对禁毒战争受害者的正义实现并嘲讽其支持者,而批评者则称这是政治迫害,认为其因选择性执法而有失公允,并对被拘留者的权利提出质疑。参议员艾米·马科斯(Imee Marcos)等公众人物对国际司法公正性表示担忧;民意调查显示,多数菲律宾人支持进行审判。

相关文章

ICC courtroom in The Hague during Duterte's absent confirmation hearing, with judges, prosecutors, victims' lawyers, and inset Philippine protests.
AI 生成的图像

ICC proceeds with confirmation hearing against Duterte in his absence

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像

The International Criminal Court has begun its confirmation of charges hearing against former President Rodrigo Duterte in The Hague, without the accused's personal presence. Over 500 drug war victims are participating through their legal representatives, while the Philippine National Police prepares for possible protests in the Philippines. This hearing will assess if there is sufficient evidence to proceed to a full trial.

The ICC Registry has formally transmitted the pre-trial decision confirming charges against former President Rodrigo Duterte to the International Criminal Court presidency. The charges involve crimes against humanity linked to his administration's anti-drug campaign and the Davao death squad. The presidency is expected to soon constitute a trial chamber for the case.

由 AI 报道

The first day of the confirmation of charges hearing against former President Rodrigo Duterte began at the International Criminal Court on February 23, 2026, in The Hague, Netherlands. Duterte did not attend after waiving his right to appear, though judges deemed him fit to participate. Prosecutors presented evidence on the Davao Death Squad and Duterte's statements.

The International Criminal Court's Appeals Chamber unanimously upheld the decision keeping former president Rodrigo Duterte in detention in The Hague, Netherlands. This is not a reclusion perpetua sentence as claimed in a viral video. The decision was issued on March 6, 2026.

由 AI 报道

Former President Rodrigo Duterte has requested a waiver of his right to attend the upcoming International Criminal Court confirmation of charges hearing, stating he does not recognize the court's jurisdiction and citing his health. He is detained in The Hague and denies the allegations against him. The Office of the Solicitor General has urged the Supreme Court to dismiss habeas corpus petitions filed by his children.

As former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte nears one year in detention at the International Criminal Court (ICC), the prosecution and victims' representatives objected to his interim release during the pre-trial stage, citing his unlikelihood to adhere to conditions and cooperate with the court. This stems from his waiver of attendance at hearings and actions by his supporters. A decision on whether the case proceeds to trial is expected within 60 days.

由 AI 报道

Following the ICC Appeals Chamber's March 6 decision upholding former president Rodrigo Duterte's detention, his Filipino legal team, led by Salvador Panelo, is planning to raise the court's jurisdiction issue at the United Nations. Panelo argues the ICC lacks authority over the case, emphasizing it is not a UN body.

 

 

 

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝