Spotify and labels seek $322M judgment against Anna’s Archive over Spotify scraping

Following Anna’s Archive’s December 2025 announcement of scraping 86 million Spotify music files, Spotify and major labels are seeking a $322 million default judgment in New York federal court. The site ignored proceedings, prompting demands for statutory damages under DMCA and copyright law, plus a permanent injunction to block access. Anna’s Archive has temporarily pulled the Spotify torrents amid pressure.

In late December 2025, shortly after Anna’s Archive announced scraping Spotify’s music library, Spotify, Sony, Universal Music Group, and Warner Music Group sued the shadow library in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs obtained a court order against the .org domain and a preliminary injunction. Anna’s Archive persisted via other domains and released torrents of the scraped files around February 9, 2026.

Evidence included analysis of 120,000 infringing files violating Spotify’s DMCA protections. With no response from Anna’s Archive, the court certified default last month. On March 26, plaintiffs moved for default judgment: $300 million in DMCA damages ($2,500 per circumvention) to Spotify, plus $22.2 million in copyright statutory damages ($150,000 per work) split among labels ($7.5M each to Sony/UMG, $7.2M to Warner). They seek a permanent injunction to destroy files and bar access via registrars, hosts, and ISPs.

The filing called Anna’s actions a 'blatant and willful disregard' for rights and court orders. AnnaArchivist responded on Reddit: 'We’ve temporarily embargoed our Spotify file release... It’s not worth the additional trouble... until we shore up our resilience.' Prior injunctions failed as Anna’s switched providers; Cloudflare noted easy circumvention. The operator runs anonymously due to arrest risks.

相关文章

Federal judge approving $7.85M Sony PlayStation antitrust settlement in courtroom, with PS5 console, controllers, and store credits on bench.
AI 生成的图像

US court preliminarily approves $7.85 million Sony PlayStation digital games antitrust settlement

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像

A federal judge in the Northern District of California has granted preliminary approval to a $7.85 million class-action settlement against Sony Interactive Entertainment over alleged anticompetitive practices on the PlayStation Store. Eligible US PlayStation Network users who bought certain digital games or vouchers from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, could receive automatic store credits or refunds, even if accounts are inactive (contact lawyers if former user). A final fairness hearing is set for October 15, 2026.

Juries in California and New Mexico last week held Meta and Alphabet's YouTube liable for harms to young users, awarding a total of over $381 million in damages. The cases targeted platform features rather than third-party content, challenging long-standing Section 230 protections. Company lawyers have vowed to appeal the rulings.

由 AI 报道

Music rights company BMG has filed a lawsuit against AI firm Anthropic, alleging unauthorized use of song lyrics to train its Claude chatbot. The complaint claims infringement dates back to Anthropic's founding and involves works by artists including Justin Bieber and Bruno Mars. BMG seeks damages up to $150,000 per infringed work.

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously on March 25 that internet service providers like Cox Communications are not liable for their subscribers' copyright infringement. The decision, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, reversed a lower court finding against Cox in a long-running dispute with Sony Music Entertainment. The ruling draws on precedents from the 1984 Betamax case and 2005 Grokster decision.

由 AI 报道

Elon Musk's xAI lost its bid for a preliminary injunction to block California's Assembly Bill 2013, which requires AI firms to disclose training data details. US District Judge Jesus Bernal ruled that xAI failed to demonstrate the law reveals trade secrets or causes irreparable harm. The company must now comply with the law, effective since January, while the lawsuit proceeds.

OpenAI has accused Elon Musk of orchestrating a last-minute legal ambush ahead of their upcoming trial. The company described Musk's recent proposals as legally improper in a court filing. The trial is scheduled to begin on April 27.

由 AI 报道

All regions in the Sussa collaboration, including Region Dalarna, are appealing a Kammarrätten ruling imposing 10 million kronor fines each. The ruling concerns a supplementary agreement on the Cosmic system. The regions are deemed to have erred in the handling.

 

 

 

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝