Supreme Court term nears end with key cases pending

The Supreme Court is preparing to issue major rulings in the coming weeks on issues including birthright citizenship and executive power.

The court has already ruled this term on global tariffs, conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors, and a case that limited the Voting Rights Act. Justices are now set to address immigration matters involving temporary protected status and green card holders. Additional cases involve the firing of Federal Reserve official Lisa Cook and changes to campaign finance and mail-in ballot rules.

相关文章

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court with symbols of pending cases on guns, elections, immigration, and presidential power.
AI 生成的图像

Supreme Court nears end of term with major cases pending on guns, elections, immigration and presidential power

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像 事实核查

The U.S. Supreme Court is nearing the end of its term, with rulings still pending in several high-profile disputes involving firearms limits, election rules, Temporary Protected Status and the scope of presidential authority.

The Supreme Court is set to issue rulings in nearly two dozen cases over the next few weeks, including several high-stakes matters involving immigration and presidential authority.

由 AI 报道

The Supreme Court has upheld birthright citizenship, ruling that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment. The 5-4 decision was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett. The ruling marks a setback for the Trump administration's immigration agenda.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that states have the power to bar transgender girls from competing on girls' and women's school sports teams. The decision upheld laws from Idaho and West Virginia.

由 AI 报道

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down federal limits on coordinated spending between political parties and their candidates. The 6-3 ruling, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, overturned a 2001 precedent and divided the justices along ideological lines. The decision allows parties to spend unlimited amounts in coordination with candidates.

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝