米連邦最高裁は今後数週間で、出生地主義による市民権や大統領の行政権といった重要課題について主要な判決を下す準備を進めている。
同裁判所は今会期において、すでに世界的な関税、LGBTQの未成年者に対する転換療法、および投票権法を制限する判決を下している。最高裁判事は現在、一時保護資格やグリーンカード保持者に関わる移民問題の審理を控えている。その他の案件には、連邦準備制度理事会（FRB）の理事であるリサ・クック氏の解任問題や、選挙資金および郵便投票に関する規則の変更などが含まれている。
AIによるレポート AIによって生成された画像
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 1, 2026, in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship. Trump attended the hearing in person—the first sitting president to do so—before leaving midway and posting criticism on Truth Social. A majority of justices expressed skepticism toward the administration’s arguments.
The Supreme Court is set to issue rulings in nearly two dozen cases over the next few weeks, including several high-stakes matters involving immigration and presidential authority.
AIによるレポート 事実確認済み
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on April 1, 2026, in a case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to limit automatic birthright citizenship for certain U.S.-born children, including those born to parents who are in the country unlawfully or who lack permanent legal status. The dispute has also fueled renewed attention on “birth tourism,” a practice critics say can involve visa fraud, though giving birth in the United States is not illegal in itself.
The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.
AIによるレポート
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 23 in Watson v. Republican National Committee, weighing whether states can count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later. The case challenges a Mississippi law allowing a five-day grace period, with similar rules in over 30 states. Conservative justices expressed concerns over fraud risks, while liberals defended state authority.