Högsta domstolens mandatperiod närmar sig sitt slut med viktiga avgöranden väntande

Högsta domstolen förbereder sig på att meddela stora domar under de kommande veckorna i frågor som bland annat rör medborgarskap genom födelse och verkställande makt.

Domstolen har redan under denna mandatperiod meddelat domar gällande globala tullar, omvändelseterapi för HBTQ-minoriteter samt ett rättsfall som begränsade rösträttslagen (Voting Rights Act). Domarna ska nu ta sig an immigrationsfrågor som rör tillfällig skyddsstatus och innehavare av gröna kort. Ytterligare rättsfall involverar avskedandet av Federal Reserve-tjänstemannen Lisa Cook samt ändringar i regler för kampanjfinansiering och poströstning.

Relaterade artiklar

President Trump attends Supreme Court hearing on birthright citizenship order as justices express skepticism.
Bild genererad av AI

Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s birthright citizenship order

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 1, 2026, in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship. Trump attended the hearing in person—the first sitting president to do so—before leaving midway and posting criticism on Truth Social. A majority of justices expressed skepticism toward the administration’s arguments.

The Supreme Court is set to issue rulings in nearly two dozen cases over the next few weeks, including several high-stakes matters involving immigration and presidential authority.

Rapporterad av AI Faktagranskad

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on April 1, 2026, in a case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to limit automatic birthright citizenship for certain U.S.-born children, including those born to parents who are in the country unlawfully or who lack permanent legal status. The dispute has also fueled renewed attention on “birth tourism,” a practice critics say can involve visa fraud, though giving birth in the United States is not illegal in itself.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.

Rapporterad av AI

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 23 in Watson v. Republican National Committee, weighing whether states can count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later. The case challenges a Mississippi law allowing a five-day grace period, with similar rules in over 30 states. Conservative justices expressed concerns over fraud risks, while liberals defended state authority.

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj