Högsta domstolen skickar tillbaka rösträttsfall från Mississippi och North Dakota

Högsta domstolen utfärdade på måndagen två oförklarade beslut om att återförvisa rösträttsfall från Mississippi och North Dakota till lägre instanser för omprövning. Åtgärderna följer domstolens nyliga avgörande i målet Louisiana mot Callais, som omformat paragraf 2 i Voting Rights Act. Domaren Ketanji Brown Jackson reserverade sig mot båda besluten.

Besluten skickade tillbaka fallen för granskning mot bakgrund av förra månadens dom i Callais-målet. I både Mississippi- och North Dakota-ärendena hade lägre domstolar behandlat påståenden om rasdiskriminering i valdistriktskartor som väckts av enskilda väljare och grupper såsom NAACP. Delstaterna hade hävdat att endast justitiedepartementet, och inte privata parter, får genomdriva centrala bestämmelser i Voting Rights Act.

Relaterade artiklar

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court handling redistricting cases from Mississippi and North Dakota
Bild genererad av AI

Supreme court sends redistricting cases back to lower courts

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court is set to issue rulings in nearly two dozen cases over the next few weeks, including several high-stakes matters involving immigration and presidential authority.

Thousands gathered in Montgomery, Alabama, on Saturday to protest recent Supreme Court rulings on congressional districts and to retrace steps from the 1965 civil rights march.

Rapporterad av AI

New congressional maps in Texas, Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee and North Carolina have split many majority-Black and plurality-Black districts into majority-White areas. The changes follow a Supreme Court decision that weakened Voting Rights Act protections. Republicans say the maps aim to strengthen their position ahead of midterms.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj