Suprema Corte devolve casos de direitos eleitorais do Mississippi e da Dakota do Norte

A Suprema Corte emitiu nesta segunda-feira duas ordens sem explicações, devolvendo casos de direitos eleitorais do Mississippi e da Dakota do Norte para tribunais de instâncias inferiores para reconsideração. As medidas seguem a recente decisão da corte em Louisiana v. Callais, que reformulou a Seção 2 da Lei de Direitos Eleitorais. A juíza Ketanji Brown Jackson divergiu de ambas as ordens.

As ordens enviaram os casos de volta para revisão à luz da decisão Callais do mês passado. Tanto nos casos do Mississippi quanto nos da Dakota do Norte, tribunais inferiores haviam analisado alegações de discriminação racial em mapas distritais apresentadas por eleitores privados e grupos como a NAACP. Os estados haviam argumentado que apenas o Departamento de Justiça, e não partes privadas, pode aplicar as principais disposições da Lei de Direitos Eleitorais.

Artigos relacionados

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court handling redistricting cases from Mississippi and North Dakota
Imagem gerada por IA

Supreme court sends redistricting cases back to lower courts

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

Reportado por IA

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Reportado por IA

The Supreme Court is set to issue rulings in nearly two dozen cases over the next few weeks, including several high-stakes matters involving immigration and presidential authority.

Thousands gathered in Montgomery, Alabama, on Saturday to protest recent Supreme Court rulings on congressional districts and to retrace steps from the 1965 civil rights march.

Reportado por IA

New congressional maps in Texas, Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee and North Carolina have split many majority-Black and plurality-Black districts into majority-White areas. The changes follow a Supreme Court decision that weakened Voting Rights Act protections. Republicans say the maps aim to strengthen their position ahead of midterms.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar