Supreme Court remands voting rights cases from Mississippi and North Dakota

The Supreme Court on Monday issued two unexplained orders returning voting rights cases from Mississippi and North Dakota to lower courts for reconsideration. The moves follow the court's recent ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that reshaped Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from both orders.

The orders sent the cases back for review in light of the Callais decision from last month. In both the Mississippi and North Dakota matters, lower courts had addressed claims of racial discrimination in district maps brought by private voters and groups such as the NAACP. The states had argued that only the Department of Justice, not private parties, may enforce key provisions of the Voting Rights Act.

Связанные статьи

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court handling redistricting cases from Mississippi and North Dakota
Изображение, созданное ИИ

Supreme court sends redistricting cases back to lower courts

Сообщено ИИ Изображение, созданное ИИ

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

Сообщено ИИ

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Сообщено ИИ

Relatives of three civil rights activists killed in the 1960s expressed deep disappointment over the Supreme Court’s April ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. The 6-3 decision eliminated the last major provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Family members called on Americans to vote to restore protections.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Mississippi law allowing election officials to count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received up to five days later. The 5-4 decision rejected a challenge by the Republican National Committee. It preserves practices used in about 18 states and territories.

Сообщено ИИ

Thousands gathered in Montgomery, Alabama, on Saturday to protest recent Supreme Court rulings on congressional districts and to retrace steps from the 1965 civil rights march.

 

 

 

Этот сайт использует куки

Мы используем куки для анализа, чтобы улучшить наш сайт. Прочитайте нашу политику конфиденциальности для дополнительной информации.
Отклонить