La Corte Suprema devuelve casos de derechos electorales de Mississippi y Dakota del Norte

El lunes, la Corte Suprema emitió dos órdenes sin explicación devolviendo casos de derechos electorales de Mississippi y Dakota del Norte a tribunales inferiores para su reconsideración. Estas decisiones siguen al reciente fallo del tribunal en el caso Louisiana contra Callais, que reconfiguró la Sección 2 de la Ley de Derechos Electorales. La jueza Ketanji Brown Jackson presentó votos particulares en contra de ambas órdenes.

Las órdenes enviaron los casos de vuelta para su revisión a la luz de la decisión sobre el caso Callais tomada el mes pasado. Tanto en el asunto de Mississippi como en el de Dakota del Norte, los tribunales inferiores habían abordado denuncias de discriminación racial en los mapas de distritos presentadas por votantes particulares y grupos como la NAACP. Los estados habían argumentado que solo el Departamento de Justicia, y no partes privadas, puede hacer cumplir las disposiciones clave de la Ley de Derechos Electorales.

Artículos relacionados

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court handling redistricting cases from Mississippi and North Dakota
Imagen generada por IA

Supreme court sends redistricting cases back to lower courts

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

Reportado por IA

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Reportado por IA

The Supreme Court is set to issue rulings in nearly two dozen cases over the next few weeks, including several high-stakes matters involving immigration and presidential authority.

Thousands gathered in Montgomery, Alabama, on Saturday to protest recent Supreme Court rulings on congressional districts and to retrace steps from the 1965 civil rights march.

Reportado por IA

New congressional maps in Texas, Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee and North Carolina have split many majority-Black and plurality-Black districts into majority-White areas. The changes follow a Supreme Court decision that weakened Voting Rights Act protections. Republicans say the maps aim to strengthen their position ahead of midterms.

 

 

 

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar