Illustration of pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai sentenced to 20 years in a Hong Kong courtroom under national security law.
Illustration of pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai sentenced to 20 years in a Hong Kong courtroom under national security law.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Hong Kong court sentences Jimmy Lai to 20 years in prison

Immagine generata dall'IA

A Hong Kong court sentenced pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai to 20 years in prison on February 9, 2026, under Beijing's national security law for conspiring to collude with foreign forces and publishing seditious material. The 78-year-old media tycoon and six former Apple Daily executives were among those imprisoned in a case drawing sharp international condemnation as a politically motivated crackdown.

On February 9, 2026, three High Court judges at West Kowloon Court handed down sentences in under 10 minutes to Jimmy Lai, six senior executives of his now-defunct Apple Daily tabloid, three associated companies, and two activists. Lai, a prominent critic of the Chinese Communist Party and founder of Apple Daily (which operated from 1995 until its forced closure in 2021 amid Beijing's crackdown), was convicted in December 2025 on two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces under the 2020 national security law and one count of conspiracy to print and distribute seditious articles. His earliest possible release is 2044 at age 96, assuming a one-third reduction for good behavior.

The six former Apple Daily staff members, who had pleaded guilty, received terms from six years and nine months to 10 years. The two activists, who testified for the prosecution, got up to seven years and three months. Lai, a Chinese-born British citizen arrested in August 2020 for alleged support of the 2019 pro-democracy protests, has endured over 1,800 days in detention, much in solitary confinement. Reports say he smiled and waved to supporters after sentencing.

Hong Kong police official Steve Li welcomed the verdict, calling Lai the 'mastermind and behind-the-scenes manipulator.' The case highlights Beijing's tightening control over the special administrative region.

International backlash was immediate. British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper deemed it 'politically motivated,' tantamount to a life sentence for the 78-year-old, and called for his humanitarian release. The US State Department, via Senator Marco Rubio, condemned it as an 'unjust and tragic conclusion' violating the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and urged parole. Representative John Moolenaar called it a 'stain on the Chinese Communist Party's human rights record.'

Lai's daughter Claire described the sentence as 'heartbreakingly cruel,' warning he could 'die a martyr behind bars.' His son Sebastian told the BBC it was 'essentially a death sentence' despite his father's dedication to Hong Kong's freedoms.

Cosa dice la gente

Initial reactions on X to Jimmy Lai's 20-year prison sentence under Hong Kong's national security law are highly polarized. Pro-democracy activists, Western politicians, journalists, and human rights organizations condemn the verdict as politically motivated persecution of journalism and free speech, highlighting Lai's age, faith, and calling for his immediate release with hashtags like #FreeJimmyLai. Chinese state media and supportive users praise the ruling as justice served, emphasizing national security, rule of law, and Lai's role as an instigator of riots colluding with foreign forces.

Articoli correlati

Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong courtroom after guilty verdict on security charges, with contrasting international protests outside.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Jimmy Lai security trial: International condemnation follows guilty verdict

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

Following Jimmy Lai's conviction on national security charges, as reported earlier, global reactions have intensified. The US and UK demand his release, citing political persecution, while Hong Kong and Chinese officials defend the ruling as upholding the law. Sentencing is pending.

Three judges in Hong Kong have convicted media tycoon Jimmy Lai on all counts in his national security trial, which lasted more than a year and a half. Lai denied two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one of conspiracy to print seditious articles. Sentencing details will follow written mitigation submissions due in early January.

Riportato dall'IA

Hong Kong's Court of Appeal overturned media tycoon Jimmy Lai's 2022 fraud conviction on Thursday, nullifying a nearly six-year sentence. The pro-democracy figure, a fierce Beijing critic detained since 2020, remains imprisoned on a 20-year national security term imposed earlier this month.

A Hong Kong court has sentenced 69-year-old Kwok Yin-sang to eight months in prison for attempting to cash out an insurance policy belonging to his daughter, US-based activist Anna Kwok, in a ruling that breached national security law. This marks the first conviction of a family member of a wanted activist under such charges.

Riportato dall'IA

Hong Kong’s Court of Appeal dismissed appeals by 12 opposition activists on Monday, who sought to overturn their convictions or reduce sentences in the city’s largest national security trial to date. The court also upheld the acquittal of one of the 47 defendants, barrister Lawrence Lau, in the high-profile conspiracy to subvert state power case. The ruling came amid tight security at the West Kowloon Court.

Otto residenti della provincia di Las Tunas, a Cuba, potrebbero affrontare fino a nove anni di carcere per il reato di «propaganda contro l'ordine costituzionale», secondo un rapporto dell'ONG Cubalex. Le autorità li collegano al gruppo Cuba Primero e citano come prove interazioni sui social media e possesso di materiali relativi alla Dichiarazione universale dei diritti umani. Gli imputati sono in detenzione preventiva da marzo e aprile 2024.

Riportato dall'IA

Hong Kong authorities have banned the screening of director Kiwi Chow Kwun-wai's latest film, the campus thriller Deadline, citing national security concerns. The 46-year-old award-winning filmmaker, known for previous works on social unrest, described the decision as “painful and unfair” in a social media post on Tuesday.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta