Collegium recommends four chief justices and senior advocate for Supreme Court

India's Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the elevation of four High Court chief justices and senior advocate V Mohana as judges to the top court.

The Collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, made the recommendations during meetings on May 22 and May 27. The names include Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar of the Bombay High Court, Chief Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, and Chief Justice Arun Palli of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Senior Advocate V Mohana, who was designated by the Supreme Court in April 2015, is also recommended. If accepted by the government, her elevation would increase the number of women judges on the bench to two, following Justice B V Nagarathna. She would be the second woman from the Bar recommended after Justice Indu Malhotra.

The Supreme Court currently has a working strength of 32 judges. In March, Chief Justice Kant had recommended raising the sanctioned strength from 34 to 38. The government approved this on May 5 through the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026.

Related Articles

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
Image generated by AI

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has nominated 37 candidates for judgeships in the High Court and Environment and Land Court. Chief Justice Martha Koome described the process as highly competitive and issued a warning on corruption. The names have been forwarded to President William Ruto for appointment.

Reported by AI

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

South Korea's judicial reform laws were proclaimed on March 12, allowing constitutional appeals against Supreme Court rulings and punishment for legal distortion. This marks the first major overhaul since the 1987 constitutional amendment, including an expansion of Supreme Court justices. The measures passed under the ruling Democratic Party despite opposition from the opposition and judiciary.

Reported by AI

The Judges Inquiry Committee investigating allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma submitted its report to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Monday. The report follows statutory requirements under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

One week after South Korea's judicial reform laws took effect on March 12—introducing constitutional appeals and penalties for 'law distortion'—complaints against top judges have risen sharply. The National Assembly is set to vote Thursday on the remaining two bills of the 'judiciary trio,' prompting fears of paralyzing the judiciary.

Reported by AI

Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma recused herself on April 28 from hearing Congress MP Karti Chidambaram's plea to quash a CBI FIR. The FIR relates to allegations of helping an alcoholic beverage company bypass a ban on duty-free whisky sales. The matter will now be listed before another bench on July 21.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline